Corporate governance and securities class actions

被引:15
作者
Chapple, Larelle [1 ]
Clout, Victoria J. [2 ]
Tan, David [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, QUT Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Australian Sch Business, Sch Accounting, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Aviat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Finance Actuarial Studies & Appl Stat, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Class actions; disclosure; governance; litigation; securities exchanges; M49; K22; K42; SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; AGENCY COSTS; DISCLOSURE; BOARD; ENFORCEMENT; DETERMINANTS; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1177/0312896213512320
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the governance attributes of firms that have been subject to securities class actions (SCAs). There has been a recent sizable increase in the number of firms subject to SCAs in Australia. We examine a sample of firms that have been subject to SCAs due to disclosure breaches and match the firms by industry and size to a control sample. First, we examine the compliance culture of the SCA firms via the frequency of Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) queries of the firm and find that the frequency of ASX queries is positively associated with the occurrence of a SCA. Secondly, we provide evidence that SCA firms exhibit weaker levels of corporate governance than the matched control sample. In addition, we contribute to the understanding of firms subject to SCAs and their corporate governance attributes. Our results suggest the presence of a nomination committee may be associated with higher agency costs and that the influence of CEO duality may reduce the effectiveness of a nomination committee.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 547
页数:23
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Management turnover and governance changes following the revelation of fraud [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Jaffe, JF ;
Karpoff, JM .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1999, 42 (01) :309-342
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MALL REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MELB UNIV LAW REV
[4]   Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures? [J].
Beekes, Wendy ;
Brown, Philip .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2006, 33 (3-4) :422-450
[5]   PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF DISCLOSURE BREACHES IN AUSTRALIA [J].
Boros, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW STUDIES, 2009, 9 (02) :409-438
[6]  
Brown P., 1999, Abacus, V35, P138
[7]   Achieving high quality, comparable financial reporting: A review of independent enforcement bodies in Australia and the United Kingdom [J].
Brown, Philip ;
Tarca, Ann .
ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 43 (04) :438-473
[8]   Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review [J].
Brown, Philip ;
Beekes, Wendy ;
Verhoeven, Peter .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2011, 51 (01) :96-172
[9]  
Burch Elizabeth Chamblee, 2007, MD L REV, V66, P348
[10]  
Cassidy A., 2003, Australian Journal of Corporate Law, V15, P81