Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and classical biological control

被引:17
|
作者
Evans, Edward W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Biol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Ecological redundancy; Niche partitioning; Species complementarity; Species introductions; Squarrose knapweed; SPOTTED KNAPWEED; LARINUS-MINUTUS; PLANT DIVERSITY; CONTROL AGENTS; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; FIELD EXPERIMENTS; DIFFUSE KNAPWEED; SPECIES RICHNESS; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS; STATISTICAL INEVITABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13355-016-0401-z
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Increasing concern over worldwide loss of biodiversity has led ecologists to focus intently on how ecosystem functioning may depend on diversity. In applied entomology, there is longstanding interest in the issue, especially as regards the importance of natural enemy diversity for pest control. Here I review parallels in interest, conceptual framework, and conclusions concerning biodiversity as it affects ecosystem functioning in general and classical biological control in particular. Whereas the former focuses on implications of loss of diversity, the latter focuses on implications of increase in diversity as additional species of natural enemies are introduced to novel communities in new geographic regions for insect pest and weed control. Many field studies now demonstrate that ecosystem functioning, e.g., as reflected in primary productivity, is enhanced and stabilized over time by high diversity as the community increases in its efficiency in exploiting available resources. Similarly, there is growing field support for the generalization that increasing species and functional diversity of natural enemies leads to increasing pest suppression. Nonetheless a central concern of classical biological control in particular, as it seeks to minimize non-target effects, remains as to whether one or a few species of natural enemies can provide sufficient pest control.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 184
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial habitats of Antarctica
    Wall, DH
    ANTARCTIC SCIENCE, 2005, 17 (04) : 523 - 531
  • [32] The prominence of and biases in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research
    Caliman, Adriano
    Pires, Aliny F.
    Esteves, Francisco A.
    Bozelli, Reinaldo L.
    Farjalla, Vinicius F.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (03) : 651 - 664
  • [33] Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning
    Duffy, JE
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2003, 6 (08) : 680 - 687
  • [34] Special issue - Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning - Preface
    Godfray, C
    Levin, S
    Yamamura, N
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (05) : 817 - 817
  • [35] Resilience in the Studies of Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning
    Mori, Akira S.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2016, 31 (02) : 87 - 89
  • [36] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances
    Loreau, M
    OIKOS, 2000, 91 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [37] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in evolving food webs
    Allhoff, K. T.
    Drossel, B.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1694)
  • [38] Biodiversity: Monitoring trends and implications for ecosystem functioning
    Hines, Jes
    Pereira, Henrique M.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (20) : R1390 - R1392
  • [39] Linking biodiversity and biotic interactions to ecosystem functioning
    Jayaramaiah, Ramesha H.
    Egidi, Eleonora
    Macdonald, Catriona A.
    Singh, Brajesh K.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 3 (03):
  • [40] Distributional (In)Congruence of Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning
    Mulder, Christian
    Boit, Alice
    Mori, Shigeta
    Vonk, J. Arie
    Dyer, Scott D.
    Faggiano, Leslie
    Geisen, Stefan
    Gonzalez, Angelica L.
    Kaspari, Michael
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    Rossberg, Axel G.
    Sterner, Robert W.
    Voigt, Winfried
    Wall, Diana H.
    ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, VOL 46: GLOBAL CHANGE IN MULTISPECIES SYSTEMS, PT 1, 2012, 46 : 1 - 88