Onset of suffusion in upward seepage under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions

被引:42
作者
Liang, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Yeh, Tian-Chyi Jim [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Junjie [1 ]
Liu, Mingwei [1 ]
Zha, Yuanyuan [4 ]
Hao, Yonghong [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Engn Res Ctr Inland Waterway Regulat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Tianjin Normal Univ, Key Lab Water Environm & Resources, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Suffusion; critical hydraulic gradient; stress state; laboratory experiment; INTERNAL EROSION; TEST APPARATUS; SOIL-EROSION; INITIATION; STABILITY; MODEL; FLOW;
D O I
10.1080/19648189.2017.1359110
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Suffusion is one of the mechanisms initiating internal erosion in levees and dams. To estimate the risks of seepage erosion, understanding the mechanism of suffusion under different stress conditions is crucial. With a stress-controlled apparatus, experiments are conduced, in which suffusion is induced by step-wise increasing hydraulic gradients under the isotropic and the anisotropic stress conditions. Based on the results, a low critical hydraulic gradient (LCHG) and a high critical hydraulic gradient (HCHG) are defined, corresponding to the local and the global mobilisations of fine particles, respectively. It is found that the critical hydraulic gradients under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions are remarkably different. Under the isotropic stresses, the critical hydraulic gradients increase monotonously with the confining stress. Whereas, under the anisotropic stress conditions, the critical hydraulic gradients increase at first and then decrease after reaching a maximum value. A microscopic scale conceptual model attributes this difference to the shear stress, created by the deviatoric stresses. In the end, a formula is proposed to estimate the critical hydraulic gradients, considering the effects of the stress conditions. The accuracy of the formula is verified by comparing the experiment results and the prediction by the formula.
引用
收藏
页码:1520 / 1534
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   WASHOUT OF GRAINS FROM FILTERED SAND AND GRAVEL MATERIALS [J].
ABERG, B .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (01) :36-53
[2]   Stochastic Analysis of Seepage under Hydraulic Structures Resting on Anisotropic Heterogeneous Soils [J].
Ahmed, Ashraf A. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (06) :1001-1004
[3]  
ASTM, 2007, ASTM D698-07
[4]   Experimental parametric study of suffusion and backward erosion [J].
Bendahmane, Fateh ;
Marot, Didier ;
Alexis, Alain .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (01) :57-67
[5]   Soil erosion in the boundary layer flow along a slope: a theoretical study [J].
Brivois, Olivier ;
Bonelli, Stephane ;
Borghi, Roland .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2007, 26 (06) :707-719
[6]  
Chan DSM, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0020456, 10.1371/journal.pone.0027218]
[7]   Critical Hydraulic Gradients of Internal Erosion under Complex Stress States [J].
Chang, D. S. ;
Zhang, L. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (09) :1454-1467
[8]   Analysis of velocity lag in sediment-laden open channel flows [J].
Cheng, NS .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (07) :657-666
[9]   Multiscale modeling of flood-induced piping in river levees [J].
El Shamy, Usama ;
Aydin, Firat .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (09) :1385-1398
[10]  
Fell R., 2007, INTERNAL EROSION DAM