A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Yang, Xuyang [1 ]
Wu, Qingbin [1 ]
Jin, Chengwu [2 ]
He, Wanbin [1 ]
Wang, Meng [1 ]
Yang, Tinghan [1 ]
Wei, Mingtian [1 ]
Deng, Xiangbing [1 ]
Meng, Wenjian [1 ]
Wang, Ziqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Fifth Peoples Hosp Chengdu, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery; Complete mesocolic excision; D3; lymphadenectomy; No-touch isolation technique; Polymerase chain reaction; Non-inferiority; Randomized controlled trial; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; TOUCH ISOLATION TECHNIQUE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; SURVIVAL; RESECTION; COLECTOMY; LIGATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Although conventional laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is widely used today, there remain many technical challenges especially for right colon cancer in obese patients. Herein, we develop a novel hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with complete mesocolic excision (CME), D3 lymphadenectomy, and a total "no-touch" isolation technique (HALS-CME) in right hemicolectomy to overcome these issues. According to previous clinic practice, this novel procedure is not only feasible and safe but has several technical merits. However, the feasibility, short-term minimally invasive virtues, long-term oncological superiority, and potential total "no-touch" isolation technique benefits of HALS-CME should be confirmed by a prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods/design: This is a single-center, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to the HALS-CME group or to the laparoscopic surgery with CME, D3 lymphadenectomy, and total "no-touch" isolation technique (LAP-CME) group, or to conventional laparoscopic surgery with CME and D3 lymphadenectomy (cLAP) group at a 1:1:1 ratio using a centralized randomization list. Primary endpoints include safety, efficacy, and being oncologically clear, and 3-year disease-free, progression-free, and overall survival. Second endpoints include operative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, and incision length), pathologic evaluation (grading the plane of surgery, length of proximal and distal resection margins, distance between the tumor and the central arterial high tie, distance between the nearest bowel wall and the same high tie, area of mesentery resected, width of the chain of lymph-adipose tissue, length of the central lymph-adipose chain, number of harvested lymph nodes), and postoperative outcomes (pain intensity, postoperative inflammatory and immune responses, postoperative recovery). Discussion: This trial will provide valuable clinical evidence for the feasibility, safety, and potential total "no-touch" isolation technique benefits of HALS-CME for right hemicolectomy. The hypothesis is that HALS-CME is feasible for the radical D3 resection of right colon cancer and offers short-term safety and long-term oncological superiority compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aalbers, A. G. J.
    Biere, S. S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, M. I. van Berge
    Bemelman, W. A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (08): : 1769 - 1780
  • [2] Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review
    Aalbers, A. G. J.
    Doeksen, A.
    Henegouwen, M. I. Van Berge
    Bemelman, W. A.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (04) : 287 - 295
  • [3] Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer
    Adamina, Michel
    Manwaring, Mark L.
    Park, Ki-Jae
    Delaney, Conor P.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (10): : 2976 - 2980
  • [4] BARNES JP, 1952, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V94, P723
  • [5] Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden
    Birgisson, H
    Talbäck, M
    Gunnarsson, U
    Påhlman, L
    Glimelius, B
    [J]. EJSO, 2005, 31 (08): : 845 - 853
  • [6] Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial
    Bonjer, HJ
    Haglind, E
    Jeekel, I
    Kazemier, G
    Páhlman, L
    Hop, WCJ
    Veldkamp, R
    Kuhry, E
    Haglind, E
    Pahlman, L
    Cuesta, MA
    Msika, S
    Morino, M
    Lacy, A
    Jeekel, I
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) : 477 - 484
  • [7] Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group Trial
    Fleshman, James
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    Green, Erin
    Anvari, Mehran
    Stryker, Steven J.
    Beart, Robert W., Jr.
    Hellinger, Michael
    Flanagan, Richard, Jr.
    Peters, Walter
    Nelson, Heidi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (04) : 655 - 664
  • [8] García-Olmo D, 1999, DIS COLON RECTUM, V42, P1449, DOI 10.1007/BF02235045
  • [9] No-touch isolation technique reduces intraoperative shedding of tumor cells into the portal vein during resection of colorectal cancer
    Hayashi, N
    Egami, H
    Kai, M
    Kurusu, Y
    Takano, S
    Ogawa, M
    [J]. SURGERY, 1999, 125 (04) : 369 - 374
  • [10] HEALD RJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1479