Role of sentinel node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer in the therapeutic strategy

被引:2
作者
Lousquy, R. [1 ]
Delpech, Y. [1 ]
Barranger, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Lariboisiere, AP HP, Serv Gynecol Obstet, F-75010 Paris, France
来源
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 10期
关键词
Sentinel lymph node; Cervical cancer; Micrometastases; Immunohistochemistry; Parametrial involvement; Laparoscopy; PELVIC LYMPH-NODES; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FREE SURVIVAL; TUMOR-CELLS; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; MICROMETASTASES; INVOLVEMENT; IB;
D O I
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.07.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 and IB1) treatment consists in surgery with a radical colpohysterectomy associated to a systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy more or less a paraaortic lymphadenectomy (Wertheim-Meigs surgery). Pelvic lymph node involvement is the main independent prognostic factor and justifies an adjuvant therapy. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure allows a reliable evaluation of the lymph node status thanks to an accurate histologic analysis. This procedure is still not validated in practice, which means the bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy is systematically done whatever the lymph node status is. Nevertheless the purpose of the SLN biopsy in cervical cancer does not consist in avoiding an unnecessary lymphadenectomy, which is not really associated with a major morbidity. Actually, a better initial stadification would allow to fit to the risk of recurrence not only the radicality of the surgery, but also the adjuvant therapy. The morbidity of a radical surgery could be limited for good prognosis patients and avoided for the benefit of a concomitant chemoradiotherapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 833
页数:7
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in cervical cancer: a critical point of view [J].
Angioli, R ;
Palaia, I ;
Cipriani, C ;
Muzii, L ;
Calcagno, M ;
Gullotta, G ;
Panici, PB .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 96 (02) :504-509
[2]  
Aubard Y, 2003, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V31, P2, DOI 10.1016/S1297-9589(02)00002-4
[3]   Sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer: state-of-the-art in 2007 [J].
Barranger, E. ;
Bricou, A. ;
Morel, O. ;
Coutant, C. ;
Delpech, Y. ;
Uzan, S. ;
Darai, E. .
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (06) :516-522
[4]   Histopathological validation of the sentinel node concept in cervical cancer [J].
Barranger, E ;
Cortez, A ;
Commo, F ;
Marpeau, O ;
Uzan, S ;
Darai, E ;
Callard, P .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (06) :870-874
[5]  
Benedet J L, 2001, J Epidemiol Biostat, V6, P7
[6]   Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: An anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy [J].
BenedettiPanici, P ;
Maneschi, F ;
Scambia, G ;
Greggi, S ;
Cutillo, G ;
DAndrea, G ;
Rabitti, C ;
Coronetta, F ;
Capelli, A ;
Mancuso, S .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (01) :19-24
[7]   Molecular staging of early colon cancer on the basis of sentinel node analysis: A multicenter phase II trial [J].
Bilchik, AJ ;
Saha, S ;
Wiese, D ;
Stonecypher, JA ;
Wood, TF ;
Sostrin, S ;
Turner, RR ;
Wang, HJ ;
Morton, DL ;
Hoon, DSB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :1128-1136
[8]   Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review [J].
Bipat, S ;
Glas, AS ;
van der Velden, J ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Stoker, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 91 (01) :59-66
[9]   Prognostic significance of occult metastases detected by sentinel lymphadenectomy and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in early-stage melanoma patients [J].
Bostick, PJ ;
Morton, DL ;
Turner, RR ;
Huynh, KT ;
Wang, HJ ;
Elashoff, R ;
Essner, R ;
Hoon, DSB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) :3238-3244
[10]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy under local anaesthesia:: How to avoid the disadvantages of intraoperative examination? [J].
Bouquier, J. ;
Clement, D. ;
Morel, O. ;
Lousquy, R. ;
Malartic, C. ;
Barranger, E. .
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2008, 36 (01) :79-84