Protein-Protein Docking with Dynamic Residue Protonation States

被引:16
|
作者
Kilambi, Krishna Praneeth [1 ]
Reddy, Kavan [1 ]
Gray, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Program Mol Biophys, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CAPRI ROUNDS 20-27; PK(A) VALUES; STRUCTURAL DETERMINANTS; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; LIGAND-BINDING; PREDICTION; COMPLEX; PH; RESOLUTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004018
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-protein interactions depend on a host of environmental factors. Local pH conditions influence the interactions through the protonation states of the ionizable residues that can change upon binding. In this work, we present a pH-sensitive docking approach, pHDock, that can sample side-chain protonation states of five ionizable residues (Asp, Glu, His, Tyr, Lys) on-the-fly during the docking simulation. pHDock produces successful local docking funnels in approximately half (79/161) the protein complexes, including 19 cases where standard RosettaDock fails. pHDock also performs better than the two control cases comprising docking at pH 7.0 or using fixed, predetermined protonation states. On average, the top-ranked pHDock structures have lower interface RMSDs and recover more native interface residue-residue contacts and hydrogen bonds compared to RosettaDock. Addition of backbone flexibility using a computationally-generated conformational ensemble further improves native contact and hydrogen bond recovery in the top-ranked structures. Although pHDock is designed to improve docking, it also successfully predicts a large pH-dependent binding affinity change in the Fc-FcRn complex, suggesting that it can be exploited to improve affinity predictions. The approaches in the study contribute to the goal of structural simulations of whole-cell protein-protein interactions including all the environmental factors, and they can be further expanded for pH-sensitive protein design.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Template-based protein-protein docking exploiting pairwise interfacial residue restraints
    Xue, Li C.
    Rodrigues, Joao P. G. L. M.
    Dobbs, Drena
    Honavar, Vasant
    Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 18 (03) : 458 - 466
  • [2] Protein-Protein Docking Reveals Dynamic Interactions of Tropomyosin on Actin Filaments
    Pavadai, Elumalai
    Lehman, William
    Rynkiewicz, Michael J.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 119 (01) : 75 - 86
  • [3] Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    STRUCTURE, 2016, 24 (10) : 1821 - 1829
  • [4] Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking
    Alsop, James D.
    Mitchell, Julie C.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 83 (11) : 1940 - 1946
  • [5] Binding free energy analysis of protein-protein docking model structures by evERdock
    Takemura, Kazuhiro
    Matubayasi, Nobuyuki
    Kitao, Akio
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 148 (10)
  • [6] Optimization of protein-protein docking for predicting Fc-protein interactions
    Agostino, Mark
    Mancera, Ricardo L.
    Ramsland, Paul A.
    Fernandez-Recio, Juan
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR RECOGNITION, 2016, 29 (11) : 555 - 568
  • [7] Shape complementarity and hydrogen bond preferences in protein-protein interfaces: implications for antibody modeling and protein-protein docking
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 32 (16) : 2451 - 2456
  • [8] Integrating atom-based and residue-based scoring functions for protein-protein docking
    Vreven, Thom
    Hwang, Howook
    Weng, Zhiping
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (09) : 1576 - 1586
  • [9] Druggability of Dynamic Protein-protein Interfaces
    Ulucan, Ozlem
    Eyrisch, Susanne
    Helms, Volkhard
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2012, 18 (30) : 4599 - 4606
  • [10] Protein-Protein Docking by Shape-Complementarity and Property Matching
    Geppert, Tim
    Proschak, Ewgenij
    Schneider, Gisbert
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 31 (09) : 1919 - 1928