Multi-period investment pathways - Modeling approaches to design distributed energy systems under uncertainty

被引:16
|
作者
Bohlayer, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Buerger, Adrian [1 ,3 ]
Fleschutz, Markus [1 ,4 ]
Braun, Marco [1 ]
Zoettl, Gregor [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Univ Appl Sci, Inst Refrigerat Air Conditioning & Environm Engn, Moltkestr 30, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Econ Ind Org & Energy Markets, Lange Gasse 20, D-90403 Nurnberg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Microsyst Engn IMTEK, Syst Control & Optimizat Lab, Georges Koehler Allee 102, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
[4] Cork Inst Technol, Dept Proc Energy & Transport Engn, Rossa Ave, Bishopstown T12 P928, Cork, Ireland
[5] Energie Campus Nurnberg,Further Str 250, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
Distributed energy systems; Mixed-integer optimization; Uncertainty; Multi-period investment; Economic planning; Multi-modal energy systems; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116368
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Multi-modal distributed energy system planning is applied in the context of smart grids, industrial energy supply, and in the building energy sector. In real-world applications, these systems are commonly characterized by existing system structures of different age where monitoring and investment are conducted in a closed-loop, with the iterative possibility to invest. The literature contains two main approaches to approximate this computationally intensive multi-period investment problem. The first approach simplifies the temporal decision-making process collapsing the multi-stage decision to a two-stage decision, considering uncertainty in the second stage decision variables. The second approach considers multi-period investments under the assumption of perfect foresight. In this work, we propose a multi-stage stochastic optimization model that captures multi-period investment decisions under uncertainty and solves the problem to global optimality, serving as a first-best benchmark to the problem. To evaluate the performance of conventional approaches applied in a multi-year setup, we propose a rolling horizon heuristic that on the one hand reveals the performance of conventional approaches applied in a multi-period set-up and on the other hand enables planners to identify approximate solutions to the original multi-stage stochastic problem. We conduct a real-world case study and investigate solution quality as well as the computational performance of the proposed approaches. Our findings indicate that the approximation of multi-period investments by two-stage stochastic approaches yield the best results regarding constraint satisfaction, while deterministic multi-period approximations yield better economic and computational performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimizing (s, S) policies, for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches
    Qiu, Ruozhen
    Sun, Minghe
    Lim, Yun Fong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 261 (03) : 880 - 892
  • [42] Optimal supply chain design and management over a multi-period horizon under demand uncertainty. Part I: MINLP and MILP models
    Analia Rodriguez, Maria
    Vecchietti, Aldo R.
    Harjunkoski, Iiro
    Grossmann, Ignacio E.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 62 : 194 - 210
  • [43] Achieving Emission-Reduction Goals: Multi-Period Power-System Expansion Under Short-Term Operational Uncertainty
    Rintamaki, Tuomas
    Oliveira, Fabricio
    Siddiqui, Afzal S.
    Salo, Ahti
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2024, 39 (01) : 119 - 131
  • [44] A robust optimization model for multi-objective multi-period supply chain planning under uncertainty considering quantity discounts
    Rahimi, Erfan
    Paydar, Mohammad Mahdi
    Mahdavi, Iraj
    Jouzdani, Javid
    Arabsheybani, Amir
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2018, 35 (04) : 214 - 228
  • [45] Multi-period portfolio selection with dynamic risk/expected-return level under fuzzy random uncertainty
    Wang, Bo
    Li, You
    Watada, Junzo
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 385 : 1 - 18
  • [46] UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR THE OPTIMAL DESIGN OF DISTRIBUTED URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS
    Mavromatidis, G.
    Orehounig, K.
    Carmeliet, J.
    EXPANDING BOUNDARIES: SYSTEMS THINKING IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, : 122 - 128
  • [47] Design of optimal quantity discounts for multi-period bilevel production planning under uncertain demands
    Yoshida, Okihiro
    Nishi, Tatsushi
    Zhang, Guoqing
    Wu, Jun
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [48] On pricing-based equilibrium for network expansion planning. A multi-period bilevel approach under uncertainty
    Escudero, Laureano F.
    Monge, Juan F.
    Rodriguez-Chia, Antonio M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 287 (01) : 262 - 279
  • [49] A Bibliometric Review on Decision Approaches for Clean Energy Systems under Uncertainty
    Pandey, Alok K.
    Krishankumar, R.
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Cavallaro, Fausto
    Mardani, Abbas
    Kar, Samarjit
    Ravichandran, K. S.
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (20)
  • [50] Comparing stochastic programming with posteriori approach for multi-objective optimization of distributed energy systems under uncertainty
    Wang, Meng
    Yu, Hang
    Lin, Xiaoyu
    Jing, Rui
    He, Fangjun
    Li, Chaoen
    ENERGY, 2020, 210