Europe at the frontline: analysing street-level motivations for the use of European Union migration law

被引:39
作者
Dorrenbacher, Nora [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
EU implementation; implementation motivations; migration law; street-level bureaucracy; IMMIGRATION CONTROL; DISCRETION; EU; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2017.1314535
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This contribution investigates what motivates the use of European Union (EU) law at the street level of migration law implementation. The street level is a crucial venue for EU implementation because lower-level implementers critically influence the level of EU compliance eventually achieved. Employing a bottom-up approach towards implementation, the article combines insights from social psychology and the street-level literature to develop expectations about the relation between individuals' motivations and their use of EU law. The study investigates through qualitative interviews to what extent German migration administrators use EU law in three multilevel decision contexts. The main findings are that uses of EU law vary across contexts and individual implementers. Particularly when national regulatory frameworks are ambiguous, substantive moral norms and instrumental motivations trigger some implementers to rely on EU law. This reliance even has the potential to correct for problematic transposition.
引用
收藏
页码:1328 / 1347
页数:20
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation [J].
Thomann, Eva .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 22 (10) :1368-1387
[32]  
Treib O., 2014, Living Reviews in European Governance, V9, DOI DOI 10.12942/LREG-2014-1
[33]  
Tummers L., 2016, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V3, P1, DOI [10.1093/jopart/muv039, DOI 10.1093/JOPART/MUV039]
[34]   Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: a policy alienation framework [J].
Tummers, Lars .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 77 (03) :555-581
[35]   Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation [J].
Tyler, TR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 57 :375-400
[36]   Even rules, uneven practices: Opening the 'black box' of EU law in action [J].
Versluis, Esther .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2007, 30 (01) :50-67
[37]   Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations [J].
Winter, SC ;
May, PJ .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 20 (04) :675-698
[38]   Using Europe: Strategic action in multi-level politics [J].
Woll, Cornelia ;
Jacquot, Sophie .
COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2010, 8 (01) :110-126
[39]   Why EU asylum standards exceed the lowest common denominator: the role of regulatory expertise in EU decision-making [J].
Zaun, Natascha .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 23 (01) :136-154