A Constrained Decomposition Approach With Grids for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

被引:73
作者
Cai, Xinye [1 ,2 ]
Mei, Zhiwei [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Zhun [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Qingfu [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Novel Software Technol & I, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Shantou Univ, Sch Engn, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Digital Signal & Image Pro, Shantou 515063, Peoples R China
[4] Shantou Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Shantou 515063, Peoples R China
[5] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Comp Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Constrained decomposition; evolutionary multiobjective optimization; grids; robust to Pareto front (PF); MANY-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; SELECTION; ADAPTATION; DIVERSITY; MOEA/D;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2017.2744674
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Decomposition-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) decompose a multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) into a set of scalar objective subproblems and solve them in a collaborative way. Commonly used decomposition approaches originate from mathematical programming and the direct use of them may not suit MOEAs due to their population-based property. For instance, these decomposition approaches used in MOEAs may cause the loss of diversity and/or be very sensitive to the shapes of Pareto fronts (PFs). This paper proposes a constrained decomposition with grids (CDG) that can better address these two issues thus more suitable for MOEAs. In addition, different subproblems in CDG defined by the constrained decomposition constitute a grid system. The grids have an inherent property of reflecting the information of neighborhood structures among the solutions, which is a desirable property for restricted mating selection in MOEAs. Based on CDG, a constrained decomposition MOEA with grid (CDG-MOEA) is further proposed. Extensive experiments are conducted to compare CDG-MOEA with the domination-based, indicator-based, and state-of-the-art decomposition-based MOEAs. The experimental results show that CDG-MOEA outperforms the compared algorithms in terms of both the convergence and diversity. More importantly, it is robust to the shapes of PFs and can still be very effective on MOPs with complex PFs (e.g., extremely convex, or with disparately scaled objectives).
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 577
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, TECH REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Int J Comput Intell Res
[3]   A Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many Objective Optimization [J].
Asafuddoula, M. ;
Ray, Tapabrata ;
Sarker, Ruhul .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (03) :445-460
[4]   HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Bader, Johannes ;
Zitzler, Eckart .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) :45-76
[5]   SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume [J].
Beume, Nicola ;
Naujoks, Boris ;
Emmerich, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) :1653-1669
[6]   Decomposition-Based-Sorting and Angle-Based-Selection for Evolutionary Multiobjective and Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Cai, Xinye ;
Yang, Zhixiang ;
Fan, Zhun ;
Zhang, Qingfu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2017, 47 (09) :2824-2837
[7]   An External Archive Guided Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition for Combinatorial Optimization [J].
Cai, Xinye ;
Li, Yexing ;
Fan, Zhun ;
Zhang, Qingfu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (04) :508-523
[8]  
Coello CAC, 2004, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V8, P256, DOI [10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067, 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067]
[9]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[10]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197