Meta-analysis: a critical appraisal of the methodology, benefits and drawbacks

被引:10
作者
Khan, Shahjahan [1 ,2 ]
Memon, Breda [3 ]
Memon, Muhammed A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Int Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Sch Agr Comp & Environm Sci, Stat, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Hlth Sci Res, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[3] McCullough Ctr, South East Queensland Surg & Sunnybank Obes Ctr, Sunnybank, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Mayne Med Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY; HETEROGENEITY; BIAS;
D O I
10.12968/hmed.2019.80.11.636
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis has become an integral part of evidence-based decision-making processes and is being increasingly used in medical and non-medical disciplines. Aggregate data or summary statistics continue to be the mainstay of meta-analysis and are used by many professional societies to support clinical practice guidelines. Meta-analyses synthesize the summary statistics from independent trials by pooling them to estimate the underlying common effect size. The results represent the highest level of evidence but only if the chosen studies are of high quality and the selection criteria are fully satisfied. It is important to address the issues of defining an explicit and relevant question, exhaustively searching for the totality of evidence, meticulous and unbiased data transfer or extraction, assessment of between study heterogeneity and the use of appropriate statistical methods for estimating summary effect measures. This article reviews the methodology, benefits and drawbacks of performing a meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 641
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BMJ, V343, pd5928, DOI [DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928, 10.1136/bmj.d5928]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, APPL MATH INFORM SCI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis
[4]  
[Anonymous], BMJ BRIT MED J, DOI 10.4271/2015-01-1534
[5]  
Bernard R.M., 2014, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, V40, P1
[6]   Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model [J].
Doi, Suhail A. R. ;
Barendregt, Jan J. ;
Khan, Shahjahan ;
Thalib, Lukman ;
Williams, Gail M. .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 45 :130-138
[7]   Simulation Comparison of the Quality Effects and Random Effects Methods of Meta-analysis [J].
Doi, Suhail A. R. ;
Barendregt, Jan J. ;
Khan, Shahjahan ;
Thalib, Lukman ;
Williams, Gail M. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (04) :E42-E44
[8]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463
[9]   Meta-analysis - Potentials and promise [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7119) :1371-1374
[10]   SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS - METAANALYSIS AND ITS PROBLEMS [J].
EYSENCK, HJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6957) :789-792