Containment of rumor spread in complex social networks

被引:144
作者
Yang, Lan [1 ,4 ]
Li, Zhiwu [1 ,2 ]
Giua, Alessandro [3 ]
机构
[1] Xidian Univ, Sch Mechanoelect Engn, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Inst Syst Secur & Control, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Cagliari, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Cagliari, Italy
[4] Univ Toulon & Var, Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LIS, Marseille, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Social networks; Threshold models; Information propagation; Rumor containment; INFLUENCE MAXIMIZATION; OPINION DYNAMICS; INFORMATION DIFFUSION; COMPETITIVE INFLUENCE; CENTRALITY MEASURE; DECISION-MAKING; PROPAGATION; EQUILIBRIUM; CONSENSUS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.055
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Rumors can propagate at great speed through social networks and produce significant damages. In order to control rumor propagation, spreading correct information to counterbalance the effect of the rumor seems more appropriate than simply blocking rumors by censorship or network disruption. In this paper, a competitive diffusion model, namely Linear Threshold model with One Direction state Transition (LT1DT), is proposed for modeling competitive information propagation of two different types in the same network. The problem of minimizing rumor spread in social networks is explored and a novel heuristic based on diffusion dynamics is proposed to solve this problem under the LT1DT. Experimental analysis on four different networks shows that the novel heuristic outperforms pagerank centrality. By seeding correct information in the proximity of rumor seeds, the novel heuristic performs as well as the greedy approach in scale-free and small-world networks but runs three orders of magnitude faster than the greedy approach. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 130
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2011, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2329, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2011.6160999
[2]   ComBIM: A community-based solution approach for the Budgeted Influence Maximization Problem [J].
Banerjee, Suman ;
Jenamani, Mamata ;
Pratihar, Dilip Kumar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 125 :1-13
[3]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[4]  
Borodin A, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6484, P539, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_48
[5]  
Budak C., 2011, P 20 INT C WORLD WID, P665, DOI DOI 10.1145/1963405.1963499
[6]  
Bullo F., 2016, Lectures on Network Systems
[7]   Efficient Influence Maximization in Social Networks [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Wang, Yajun ;
Yang, Siyu .
KDD-09: 15TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2009, :199-207
[8]   Complexity of equilibrium in competitive diffusion games on social networks [J].
Etesami, Seyed Rasoul ;
Basar, Tamer .
AUTOMATICA, 2016, 68 :100-110
[9]  
Fazeli A, 2014, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P4455, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2014.7040084
[10]   Opinion dynamics in social networks with stubborn agents: Equilibrium and convergence rate [J].
Ghaderi, Javad ;
Srikant, R. .
AUTOMATICA, 2014, 50 (12) :3209-3215