High commitment human resource practices and employee behavior: a multi-level analysis

被引:20
作者
Nam, Jungmin [1 ]
Lee, Hwansoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Dept Entrepreneurship, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
Affective commitment; Turnover intention; Organizational trust; Cooperative labor-management relations; High commitment human resource practices; LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION; PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; TRUST; TURNOVER; JUSTICE; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/IJM-09-2016-0171
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between high commitment human resource practices (HCHRPs), conceptualized at the workplace level and employees' attitudes, including affective commitment (AC) and turnover intention (TI). The study also tests the moderating role of cooperative labor-management relations (CLMR) between HCHRPs and organizational trust (OT). Design/methodology/approach Based on social exchange theory and trust commitment theory, the authors build a research model that explains employee behavior and empirically prove the model by using samples of 407 employees from South Korea. This study uses hierarchical linear regression and cross-level hypotheses based on hierarchical linear modeling. Findings The results demonstrate the positive impact of HCHRPs on an AC and TI, through OT. However, no moderating effect of CLMR between human resource management (HRM) practices and OT is observed. Originality/value Few theory-based studies test the direct linkage between HRM practices and outcomes. This study is designed with a multi-level research method to provide a conceptually comprehensive and deeper understanding of how HRM practices work in an organization by testing the relationship between organizational practices and employees' outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 686
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   THE MEASUREMENT AND ANTECEDENTS OF AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ALLEN, NJ ;
MEYER, JP .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 63 (01) :1-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], METHODOLOGY SOCIAL S
[3]  
Appelbaum E., 2000, Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off
[4]  
ARTHUR JB, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P670, DOI 10.5465/256705
[5]   Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model [J].
Aryee, S ;
Budhwar, PS ;
Chen, ZX .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (03) :267-285
[6]   VARIOUS INTRACLASS CORRELATION RELIABILITY COEFFICIENTS [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (05) :762-765
[7]   Good industrial relations, joint problem solving, and HRM [J].
Beaumont, PB ;
Harris, RID .
RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1996, 51 (02) :391-406
[8]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P3, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[9]   Trust and affective commitment as energizing forces for export performance [J].
Bloemer, Josee ;
Pluymaekers, Mark ;
Odekerken, Armand .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2013, 22 (02) :363-380
[10]  
Boxall P., 2015, ECON IND DEMOCRACY, V39, P27