Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer

被引:33
作者
Narwani, Vishal [1 ]
Nalamada, Keerthana [1 ]
Lee, Michael [2 ]
Kothari, Prasad [3 ]
Lakhani, Raj [2 ]
机构
[1] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, London, England
[3] Luton & Dunstable Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Luton, Beds, England
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2016年 / 38卷 / 04期
关键词
readability; quality; laryngeal cancer; internet; patient information; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; LITERACY; ENROLLEES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/hed.23939
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. Patients are increasingly using the internet to access health-related information. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability and quality of laryngeal cancer-related websites. Methods. Patient education materials were identified by performing an internet search using 3 search engines. Readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Gunning Fog Index (GFI). The DISCERN instrument was utilized to assess quality of health information. Results. A total of 54 websites were included in the analysis. The mean readability scores were as follows: FRES, 48.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44.8-51.6); FKGL, 10.9 (95% CI = 10.3-11.5); and GFI, 13.8 (95% CI = 11.3-16.3). These scores suggest that, on average, online information about patients with laryngeal cancer is written at an advanced level. The mean DISCERN score was 49.8 (95% CI - 45.4-54.2), suggesting that online information is of variable quality. Conclusion. Our study suggests much of the laryngeal cancer information available online is of suboptimal quality and written at a level too difficult for the average adult to read comfortably. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 605
页数:5
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ademiluyi G, 2003, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V50, P151
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Technical Report
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NAT ACT PLAN IMPR HL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH LIT AM ADULTS R
[5]   Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics [J].
Badarudeen, Sameer ;
Sabharwal, Sanjeev .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (10) :2572-2580
[6]   Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Bailey, Marc A. ;
Coughlin, Patrick A. ;
Sohrabi, Soroush ;
Griffin, Kathryn J. ;
Rashid, S. Tawqeer ;
Troxler, Max A. ;
Scott, D. Julian A. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 56 (01) :21-26
[7]   The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services [J].
Baker, DW ;
Parker, RM ;
Williams, MV ;
Clark, WS ;
Nurss, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (06) :1027-1030
[8]   Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among Medicare managed care enrollees [J].
Baker, DW ;
Gazmararian, JA ;
Williams, MV ;
Scott, T ;
Parker, RM ;
Green, D ;
Ren, JL ;
Peel, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (08) :1278-1283
[9]   Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review [J].
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Sheridan, Stacey L. ;
Donahue, Katrina E. ;
Halpern, David J. ;
Crotty, Karen .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (02) :97-+
[10]  
Biermann JS, 1999, CANCER, V86, P381, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<381::AID-CNCR4>3.3.CO