Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies

被引:19
作者
Rosman, Tom [1 ]
Bosnjak, Michael [1 ]
Silber, Henning [2 ]
Kossmann, Joanna [1 ]
Heycke, Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Psychol ZPID, Univ Ring 15, D-54296 Trier, Germany
[2] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
epistemic trust; experimental study; open science practices; science communication; survey study; trust in science; CREDIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/09636625221100686
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In two studies, we examined whether open science practices, such as making materials, data, and code of a study openly accessible, positively affect public trust in science. Furthermore, we investigated whether the potential trust-damaging effects of research being funded privately (e.g. by a commercial enterprise) may be buffered by such practices. After preregistering six hypotheses, we conducted a survey study (Study 1; N = 504) and an experimental study (Study 2; N = 588) in two German general population samples. In both studies, we found evidence for the positive effects of open science practices on trust, though it should be noted that in Study 2, results were more inconsistent. We did not however find evidence for the aforementioned buffering effect. We conclude that while open science practices may contribute to increasing trust in science, the importance of making use of open science practices visible should not be underestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1062
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Consistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes [J].
Younger-Khan, Sukayna ;
Weidmann, Nils B. ;
Oswald, Lisa .
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01)
[22]   Regaining Trust in Public Health and Biomedical Science following Covid: The Role of Scientists [J].
Caplan, Arthur L. .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2023, 53 :S105-S109
[23]   Science and society in Ireland: examining public trust in scientists against a global background [J].
Roche, Joseph ;
Hurley, Mairead ;
Fowler, Karen ;
McConville, Amelia ;
Taylor, Aoife ;
Mede, Niels G. ;
Cologna, Viktoria .
IRISH EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2025,
[24]   How open is communication science? Open-science principles in the field [J].
Haim, Mario ;
Jungblut, Marc .
ANNALS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, 2023, 47 (03) :338-357
[25]   How to Communicate Science to the Public? Recommendations for Effective Written Communication Derived From a Systematic Review [J].
Koenig, Laura M. ;
Altenmueller, Marlene S. ;
Fick, Julian ;
Crusius, Jan ;
Genschow, Oliver ;
Sauerland, Melanie .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 233 (01) :40-51
[26]   Open Science Practices as Seen from the Perspective of Peruvian Basic Science Researcher Communities [J].
Manco, Alejandra .
REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2023, 48 (03) :40-55
[27]   Value transparency and promoting warranted trust in science communication [J].
Kristen Intemann .
Synthese, 203
[28]   Education, Communication, and Science in the Public Sphere [J].
Feinstein, Noah Weeth .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2015, 52 (02) :145-163
[29]   Value transparency and promoting warranted trust in science communication [J].
Intemann, Kristen .
SYNTHESE, 2024, 203 (02)
[30]   Understanding the Problem of "Hype": Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science [J].
Intemann, Kristen .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 52 (03) :279-294