Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies

被引:20
作者
Rosman, Tom [1 ]
Bosnjak, Michael [1 ]
Silber, Henning [2 ]
Kossmann, Joanna [1 ]
Heycke, Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Psychol ZPID, Univ Ring 15, D-54296 Trier, Germany
[2] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
epistemic trust; experimental study; open science practices; science communication; survey study; trust in science; CREDIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/09636625221100686
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In two studies, we examined whether open science practices, such as making materials, data, and code of a study openly accessible, positively affect public trust in science. Furthermore, we investigated whether the potential trust-damaging effects of research being funded privately (e.g. by a commercial enterprise) may be buffered by such practices. After preregistering six hypotheses, we conducted a survey study (Study 1; N = 504) and an experimental study (Study 2; N = 588) in two German general population samples. In both studies, we found evidence for the positive effects of open science practices on trust, though it should be noted that in Study 2, results were more inconsistent. We did not however find evidence for the aforementioned buffering effect. We conclude that while open science practices may contribute to increasing trust in science, the importance of making use of open science practices visible should not be underestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1062
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science [J].
Aarts, Alexander A. ;
Anderson, Joanna E. ;
Anderson, Christopher J. ;
Attridge, Peter R. ;
Attwood, Angela ;
Axt, Jordan ;
Babel, Molly ;
Bahnik, Stepan ;
Baranski, Erica ;
Barnett-Cowan, Michael ;
Bartmess, Elizabeth ;
Beer, Jennifer ;
Bell, Raoul ;
Bentley, Heather ;
Beyan, Leah ;
Binion, Grace ;
Borsboom, Denny ;
Bosch, Annick ;
Bosco, Frank A. ;
Bowman, Sara D. ;
Brandt, Mark J. ;
Braswell, Erin ;
Brohmer, Hilmar ;
Brown, Benjamin T. ;
Brown, Kristina ;
Bruening, Jovita ;
Calhoun-Sauls, Ann ;
Callahan, Shannon P. ;
Chagnon, Elizabeth ;
Chandler, Jesse ;
Chartier, Christopher R. ;
Cheung, Felix ;
Christopherson, Cody D. ;
Cillessen, Linda ;
Clay, Russ ;
Cleary, Hayley ;
Cloud, Mark D. ;
Cohn, Michael ;
Cohoon, Johanna ;
Columbus, Simon ;
Cordes, Andreas ;
Costantini, Giulio ;
Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet ;
Cremata, Ed ;
Crusius, Jan ;
DeCoster, Jamie ;
DeGaetano, Michelle A. ;
Della Penna, Nicolas ;
den Bezemer, Bobby ;
Deserno, Marie K. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6251)
[2]  
Akin Heather., 2017, The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.3, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190497620.013.3]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Public Attitudes to Science 2011
[4]  
Anvari F., 2018, Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, V3, P266, DOI DOI 10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822
[5]   Repairing Trust in Organizations and Institutions: Toward a Conceptual Framework [J].
Bachmann, Reinhard ;
Gillespie, Nicole ;
Priem, Richard .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2015, 36 (09) :1123-1142
[6]  
Beck SJ., 2020, PSYCHARCHIVES, DOI [10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3149, DOI 10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3149]
[7]  
Bezjak S., 2018, OPEN SCI TRAINING HD, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.1212496, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1212496]
[8]  
Boselli B., 2016, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY, V33, P1
[9]  
Chambers C., 2018, GUARDIAN 0823
[10]   How (and Whether) to Teach Undergraduates About the Replication Crisis in Psychological Science [J].
Chopik, William J. ;
Bremner, Ryan H. ;
Defever, Andrew M. ;
Keller, Victor N. .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 45 (02) :158-163