Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study

被引:8
作者
Qu, Wenjie [1 ]
Li, Hua [2 ]
Zhang, Teng [1 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Ban, Yanli [1 ]
Li, Ningfeng [1 ,3 ]
Jiang, Jingyan [4 ]
Xie, Juan [2 ]
Shi, Wentian [5 ]
Hao, Yiping [1 ,3 ]
Li, Ruowen [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [5 ]
Cui, Baoxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Qilu Hosp, 107 Wenhua West Rd, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[2] Taian Cent Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, 29 Longtan Rd, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, 44 Wenhua West Rd, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[4] Jinan Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 105 Jiefang Rd, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[5] Liaocheng Peoples Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, 67 Dongchang West Rd, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
关键词
Caesarean scar pregnancy; Endogenic; Methotrexate; Curettage; Hysteroscopy; METHOTREXATE; CURETTAGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04633-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different treatment strategies for endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients. Methods According to Vial's standard, we defined endogenic-type CSP as (1) the gestational sac growing towards the uterine cavity and (2) a greater than 0.3 cm thickness of myometrial tissue at the caesarean scar. A total of 447 endogenic CSP patients out of 527 patients from 4 medical centres in China were enrolled in this study. A total of 120 patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX) followed by surgery, 106 received ultrasound-guided curettage directly and 221 received curettage combined with hysteroscopy. The clinical information and clinical outcomes of these patients were reviewed. Successful treatment was defined as (1) no additional treatment needed, (2) no retained mass of conception and (3) serum beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) level returning to a normal level within 4 weeks. The success rate was analysed based on these factors. Result Among 447 patients, no significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between groups except for foetal heartbeat. The success rate was significantly different (p<0.001) among the three groups. The highest success rate of 95.9% was noted in the hysteroscopy group, and the lowest success rate of 84.0% was noted in the curettage group. In addition, the MTX group reported the longest hospital stay and highest expenses, but the curettage group showed the shortest and lowest expenses, respectively. Nevertheless, no difference in blood loss was observed between the groups. Conclusion The combination of curettage and hysteroscopy represents the most effective strategy. Pretreatment with MTX did not result in better clinical outcomes. Ultrasound-guided curettage directly should not be considered a first-line treatment choice for endogenic CSP patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Is suction curettage an effective treatment alternative for cesarean scar pregnancies?
    Bagli, Ihsan
    Bakir, Mehmet Sait
    Dogan, Yasemin
    Erdem, Selami
    Tasin, Cuma
    Demirel, Neslihan Ugur
    Kulahcioglu, Mehmet Irfan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 258 : 193 - 197
  • [2] Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cali, G.
    Timor-Tritsch, I. E.
    Palacios-Jaraquemada, J.
    Monteaugudo, A.
    Buca, D.
    Forlani, F.
    Familiari, A.
    Scambia, G.
    Acharya, G.
    D'Antonio, F.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (02) : 169 - +
  • [3] Local Methotrexate Injection as the First-line Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Review of the Literature
    Cheung, Vincent Y. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 753 - 758
  • [4] A Retrospective Analysis of the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound, Uterine Artery Embolization and Surgery
    Fang, Shanyu
    Zhang, Ping
    Zhu, Yuanfang
    Wang, Fen
    He, Linsheng
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2020, 7
  • [5] Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review
    Giampaolino, P.
    De Rosa, N.
    Morra, I.
    Bertrando, A.
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Zizolfi, B.
    Ferrara, C.
    Della Corte, L.
    Bifulco, G.
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [6] Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: Current Management Strategies
    Glenn, Tanya L.
    Bembry, James
    Findley, Austin D.
    Yaklic, Jerome L.
    Bhagavath, Bala
    Gagneux, Pascal
    Lindheim, Steven R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (05) : 293 - 302
  • [7] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez, Natalia
    Tulandi, Togas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 738
  • [8] Systematic review: What is the best first-line approach for cesarean section ectopic pregnancy?
    Kanat-Pektas, Mine
    Bodur, Serkan
    Dundar, Ozgur
    Bakir, Vuslat Lale
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 55 (02): : 263 - 269
  • [9] Cesarean scar pregnancy; Diagnosis and management between 2003 and 2015 in a single center
    Kim, So Yun
    Yoon, So Ra
    Kim, Mi Jung
    Chung, Jin Hoon
    Kim, Moon Young
    Lee, Si Won
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (05): : 688 - 691
  • [10] LARSEN JV, 1978, S AFR MED J, V53, P142