Comparative Study on Sino-US Student Loan Repayment Policy

被引:0
作者
Shen Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (11TH) VOL I | 2015年
关键词
Student loans; Payment policy; Loan debt burden; Loans forgiveness; Sino-US comparison;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Student loan has become an important financial aid program to help students from lower-income families to complete higher education around the world, and student loan debt burden and loan repayment are common problems in many countries. In 2015, the student loan policy in China has gone through a major reform, whose primary goal is to ease the debt burden for students. Since the student loan policy implementation in the USA, it has been highly efficient. We determine that a comparative study on student loan repayment policies in the USA and China has the vital significance. By comparing the student loan repayment policy, graduate loan debt burden, and the loan forgiveness mechanism of China and the USA, we find the level of institution, the type of university, discipline and employment units will lead to the debt burden differences. Then from the perspective of decreasing the Chinese student debt burden, we put forward the corresponding policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1166
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NACES WINTER 2011 SA, P3
[2]  
Baum S., 2003, NASFAA Journal of Student Financial Aid, V33, P7
[3]  
Chapman Bruce, 2009, 592 AUSTR NAT U CTR, P9
[4]  
Chapman Bruce, 2011, 5532 IZA, P13
[5]  
DU Yu-bo, PERFECT GOVT STUDENT
[6]  
Federal Student Aid, 2010, STUD GUID 2011 2012, P33
[7]  
Federal Student Aid, 2009, FUND ED HIGH SCH GUI, P37
[8]  
Kirshstein Berger, 2004, WORFORCE CONTINGENT
[9]  
LI Ke-qiang, STAT COUNC EX M STRE
[10]   Student loans in Canada: an analysis of borrowing and repayment [J].
Schwartz, S ;
Finnie, R .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2002, 21 (05) :497-512