A portrait of accessibility change for four US metropolitan areas

被引:18
作者
Merlin, Louis A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Accessibility; infill; speed; metropolitan planning; congestion; travel-demand models; HIGH-SPEED RAIL; SAN-FRANCISCO; LAND-USE; TERRITORIAL COHESION; TRANSPORT; IMPACTS; IMPROVEMENT; NETWORK; ISSUES; CHINA;
D O I
10.5198/jtlu/2015.808
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Accessibility is a key objective of regional planning, one requiring the coordination of transportation and land use. Several metropolitan planning organizations in the United States and Europe have started to incorporate accessibility metrics into their evaluation of future regional scenarios. This paper describes changes in accessibility to employment by auto and transit for four contrasting metropolitan areas between 2000 and 2010. The effect of changing residential locations, changing employment locations, and changing travel speeds on accessibility change is decomposed and analyzed. Residential locations are generally shifting toward low-accessibility locations, degrading regional accessibility. Shifting employment locations have differential effects across metros, improving the accessibility of central locations in some metros while improving the accessibility of peripheral locations in others. Travel speeds also show strongly contrasting patterns across metros, with speed-related accessibility benefits concentrated in high-density locations for some metros (Chicago), while low-density locations are the primary beneficiary in other metros (Charlotte and St. Louis).
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 336
页数:28
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
Geurs KT., 2004, Journal of Transport Geography, V12, P127, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2003.10.005
[22]   IS THE JOURNEY TO WORK EXPLAINED BY URBAN STRUCTURE [J].
GIULIANO, G ;
SMALL, KA .
URBAN STUDIES, 1993, 30 (09) :1485-1500
[23]   SUBCENTERS IN THE LOS-ANGELES REGION [J].
GIULIANO, G ;
SMALL, KA .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1991, 21 (02) :163-182
[24]  
Glaeser E L., 2003, Handbook of regional and urban economics
[25]  
Grengs J, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P10
[26]   Intermetropolitan Comparison of Transportation Accessibility: Sorting Out Mobility and Proximity in San Francisco and Washington, DC [J].
Grengs, Joe ;
Levine, Jonathan ;
Shen, Qing ;
Shen, Qingyun .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2010, 29 (04) :427-443
[27]   Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment [J].
Gutierrez, Javier ;
Condeco-Melhorado, Ana ;
Carlos Martin, Juan .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 18 (01) :141-152
[28]   Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives [J].
Handy, SL ;
Niemeier, DA .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1997, 29 (07) :1175-1194
[29]   Changing intra-metropolitan accessibility in the US: Evidence from Atlanta [J].
Helling, A .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1998, 49 :55-+
[30]   Twenty years of accessibility improvements. The case of the Spanish motorway building programme [J].
Holl, Adelheid .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 15 (04) :286-297