Long-term pain and recurrence after repair of ventral incisional hernias by open mesh: clinical and MRI study

被引:38
作者
Paajanen, H [1 ]
Hermunen, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Mikkeli, Dept Surg & Radiol, Mikkeli 50100, Finland
关键词
ventral hernia; mesh; magnetic resonance imaging; surgical results;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-003-0440-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Polypropylene mesh repair of large incisional ventral hernias has become increasingly popular. Long-term effects of the mesh on pain and abdominal muscles are not known. Patients/methods: Retromuscular pre-peritoneal polypropylene mesh was placed by open technique in 84 consecutive patients with large ventral hernias (mean defect size 130 cm(2)). We re-examined the patients after a mean follow-up time of 3 years to find out the frequency of recurrence and chronic pain. We measured the thickness of abdominal muscles of eight patients preoperatively, and postoperatively after 1 year, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Recurrent hernias had appeared in four patients (5%) at follow-up. Nine patients (13%) needed occasional pain-relieving drugs, but only three (4%) suffered persistent, severe, pain from the mesh. Some limitation during leisure-time physical activities was found in 10% of patients. Only ten patients (12%) were re-operated on because of wound complications or recurrence. MRI study indicated that abdominal muscles were postoperatively well preserved. Although wound infections (6%) and seroma (9%) were frequent complications, there was no need for meshes to be removed in the follow-up. Conclusion: Open ventral herniorrhaphy with mesh is safe, effective and inexpensive. Small, recurrent hernias were infrequent and easy to re-operated on. Severe pain from the mesh was not common. Postoperative MRI study indicated no obvious damage of abdominal muscles after mesh placement.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 370
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: A nationwide questionnaire study
    Bay-Nielsen, M
    Perkins, FM
    Kehlet, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [2] Surgical treatment of incisional hernia
    Cassar, K
    Munro, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (05) : 534 - 545
  • [3] Heniford BT, 2000, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V190, P645, DOI 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00280-5
  • [4] A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia
    Luijendijk, RW
    Hop, WCJ
    van den Tol, P
    de Lange, DCD
    Braaksma, MMJ
    Ijzermans, JNM
    Boelhouwer, RU
    de Vries, BC
    Salu, MKM
    Wereldsma, JCJ
    Bruijninckx, CMA
    Jeekel, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (06) : 392 - 398
  • [5] MAAS SM, 1908, AM COLL SURG, V194, P388
  • [6] Martin-Duce A, 2001, Hernia, V5, P70
  • [7] Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: A comparison of flap and mesh closure
    Mathes, SJ
    Steinwald, PM
    Foster, RD
    Hoffman, WY
    Anthony, JP
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (04) : 586 - 594
  • [8] Retrorectus prosthetic mesh repair of midline abdominal hernia
    McLanahan, D
    King, LT
    Weems, C
    Novotney, M
    Gibson, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (05) : 445 - 449
  • [9] Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy?
    Paajanen H.
    [J]. Hernia, 2002, 6 (1) : 26 - 28
  • [10] Petersen S, 2001, EUR J SURG, V167, P453