Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods

被引:20
|
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ]
Vereijken, A. [2 ]
Muir, W. M. [3 ]
Meuwissen, T. [4 ]
Cheng, H. [5 ]
Megens, H-J [1 ]
Groenen, M. A. M. [1 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Hendrix Genet Res & Technol Ctr, Boxmeer, Netherlands
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Anim & Aquacultural Sci, As, Norway
[5] ARS, USDA, Avian Dis & Oncol Lab, E Lansing, MI USA
关键词
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; POSITIVE SELECTION; HITCHHIKING;
D O I
10.1038/hdy.2014.55
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Genomic selection (GS) is a DNA-based method of selecting for quantitative traits in animal and plant breeding, and offers a potentially superior alternative to traditional breeding methods that rely on pedigree and phenotype information. Using a 60 K SNP chip with markers spaced throughout the entire chicken genome, we compared the impact of GS and traditional BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) selection methods applied side-by-side in three different lines of egg-laying chickens. Differences were demonstrated between methods, both at the level and genomic distribution of allele frequency changes. In all three lines, the average allele frequency changes were larger with GS, 0.056 0.064 and 0.066, compared with BLUP, 0.044, 0.045 and 0.036 for lines B1, B2 and W1, respectively. With BLUP, 35 selected regions (empirical P<0.05) were identified across the three lines. With GS, 70 selected regions were identified. Empirical thresholds for local allele frequency changes were determined from gene dropping, and differed considerably between GS (0.167-0.198) and BLUP (0.105-0.126). Between lines, the genomic regions with large changes in allele frequencies showed limited overlap. Our results show that GS applies selection pressure much more locally than BLUP, resulting in larger allele frequency changes. With these results, novel insights into the nature of selection on quantitative traits have been gained and important questions regarding the long-term impact of GS are raised. The rapid changes to a part of the genetic architecture, while another part may not be selected, at least in the short term, require careful consideration, especially when selection occurs before phenotypes are observed.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 513
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods
    M Heidaritabar
    A Vereijken
    W M Muir
    T Meuwissen
    H Cheng
    H-J Megens
    M A M Groenen
    J W M Bastiaansen
    Heredity, 2014, 113 : 503 - 513
  • [2] Genome-based diagnosis of genetic disease
    Lam, Ching-Wan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 131 (04) : 484 - 485
  • [3] Comparing genome-based estimates of relatedness for use in pedigree-based conservation management
    Hauser, Samantha S.
    Galla, Stephanie J.
    Putnam, Andrea S.
    Steeves, Tammy E.
    Latch, Emily K.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2022, : 2546 - 2558
  • [4] Pedigree and genome-based patterns of homozygosity in the South African Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds
    Visser, Carina
    Lashmar, Simon Frederick
    Reding, Jason
    Berry, Donagh P.
    van Marle-Koster, Este
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
  • [5] Consistency of genome-based methods in measuring Metazoan evolution
    Zdobnov, EM
    von Mering, C
    Letunic, I
    Bork, P
    FEBS LETTERS, 2005, 579 (15) : 3355 - 3361
  • [6] The Effects of Human Selection on Elite Tomato Germplasm and Implications for Genome-based Selection
    Francis, David
    Sim, Sung-Chur
    Merk, Heather
    Van Deynze, Allen
    Stoffel, Kevin
    Hamilton, John
    Buell, C. Robin
    Zarka, Dan
    Douches, David
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (09) : S76 - S76
  • [8] Genome-Based Selection and Characterization of Fusarium circinatum-Specific Sequences
    Maphosa, Mkhululi N.
    Steenkamp, Emma T.
    Wingfield, Brenda D.
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2016, 6 (03): : 631 - 639
  • [9] Novel natural compounds obtained by genome-based screening and genetic engineering
    Pelzer, S
    Vente, A
    Bechthold, A
    CURRENT OPINION IN DRUG DISCOVERY & DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 8 (02) : 228 - 238
  • [10] Bayesian multitrait kernel methods improve multienvironment genome-based prediction
    Antonio Montesinos-Lopez, Osval
    Cricelio Montesinos-Lopez, Jose
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Manuel Ramirez-Alcaraz, Juan
    Poland, Jesse
    Singh, Ravi
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Crespo, Leonardo
    Mondal, Sushismita
    Govidan, Velu
    Juliana, Philomin
    Huerta Espino, Julio
    Shrestha, Sandesh
    Varshney, Rajeev K.
    Crossa, Jose
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2022, 12 (02):