Evaluation of governmental safety regulatory functions in preventing major accidents in China

被引:26
作者
Gao, Yuan [1 ]
Fan, Yunxiao [1 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Duan, Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Regulatory functions; Major accident; Safety regulation; FRAM; Comprehensive evaluation; ANALYSIS METHOD FRAM; RISK-MANAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; RESONANCE; RULE; SYSTEMS; PART; WORKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Governmental safety regulatory functions play an important role in preventing major accidents by incorporating lessons from both the investigation of major accidents and the theory of system accident causation. However, to date, these functions have not been evaluated. In China, a unique aspect of accident prevention is that the government engages in macro-safety regulation. In this paper, the analysis process of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) is applied to the Chinese safety regulatory system to classify and evaluate governmental safety regulatory functions. The results show that there are nine main regulatory functions, and they are divided into four levels. The potential performance variability in the outputs of regulatory functions influences other functions through up-down coupling. The entire regulatory system could therefore undergo unexpected changes that could lead to major accidents. The two most important functions are F1, formulating a plan, and F2, enacting laws and regulations. This system reverses the past view of focusing only on the non-compliance behaviours of government regulators and companies. Some safety constraints are proposed in this paper, which mainly include monitoring and suppression, to reduce the unreasonable output of functions and unexpected changes. This paper provides a new perspective for other countries to further evaluate their governmental safety regulatory functions.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 311
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   An application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to risk analysis of multifunctional flood defences in the Netherlands [J].
Anvarifar, Fatemeh ;
Voorendt, Mark Z. ;
Zevenbergen, Chris ;
Thissen, Wil .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 158 :130-141
[2]   AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO NORMS [J].
AXELROD, R .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1986, 80 (04) :1095-1111
[3]   Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: The cases of STAMP and FRAM [J].
Bjerga, Torbjorn ;
Aven, Terje ;
Zio, Enrico .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 156 :203-209
[4]   Applying systems thinking approach to accident analysis in China: Case study of "7.23" Yong-Tai-Wen High-Speed train accident [J].
Fan, Yunxiao ;
Li, Zhi ;
Pei, Jingjing ;
Li, Hongyu ;
Sun, Jiang .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 76 :190-201
[5]  
Gao Y., 2017, IND SAF ENV PROTECT, V47, P49
[6]   Safety regulation: The lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden [J].
Hale, Andrew ;
Borys, David ;
Adams, Mark .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 71 :112-122
[7]   Working to rule or working safely? Part 2: The management of safety rules and procedures [J].
Hale, Andrew ;
Borys, David .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 :222-231
[8]   Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review [J].
Hale, Andrew ;
Borys, David .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 :207-221
[9]  
Hausken K., 2014, ANN OPER RES, P1
[10]   The impact of disaster on the strategic interaction between company and government [J].
Hausken, Kjell ;
Zhuang, Jun .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 225 (02) :363-376