A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products

被引:19
作者
Azzopardi, David [1 ]
Ebajemito, James [1 ]
McEwan, Michael [1 ]
Camacho, Oscar M. [1 ]
Thissen, Jesse [1 ]
Hardie, George [1 ]
Voisine, Richard [2 ]
Mullard, Gavin [3 ]
Cohen, Zvi [2 ]
Murphy, James [4 ]
机构
[1] BAT Investments Ltd, Res & Dev, Regents Pk Rd, Southampton SO15 8TL, Hants, England
[2] Imperial Tobacco Canada, 3711 St Antoine St West, Montreal, PQ H4C 3P6, Canada
[3] BAT Holdings Ltd, Globe House,4 Temple Pl, London WC2R 2PG, England
[4] RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co, 950 Reynolds Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27105 USA
关键词
COMBUSTIBLE CIGARETTES; DOSE PHARMACOKINETICS; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES; ABUSE LIABILITY; TOBACCO; SNUS; SINGLE; GUM; DELIVERY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-10544-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are intended for short-term use to help cigarette smokers to quit. Some smokers find NRTs ineffective or seek a more satisfactory source of nicotine. Tobacco-free oral nicotine pouch (NP) products have emerged as a potential reduced risk product compared with cigarettes and other tobacco products. In a randomised crossover clinical study, thirty-four healthy adult smokers were enrolled and their nicotine C-max and AUC(0-T) determined for three 4 mg nicotine products (NP, gum, lozenge) under fasting conditions. The NP, lozenge and gum mean C-max values were 8.5, 8.3 and 4.4 ng/mL, AUC(0-T) values were 30.6, 31.5 and 14.3 ng*h/mL, respectively. The NP showed similar nicotine bioavailability to the lozenge (p = 0.6526 (C-max), p = 1.0000 (AUC(0-T))), and superior bioavailability to the gum (p < 0.0001 for C-max and AUC(0-T)). Compared with the lozenge, the NP demonstrated greater product satisfaction with a higher number of positive responses to subjective satisfaction questions. All products were judged to be well-tolerated; the incidence of minor adverse events was lower for the NP (18.2%) than the lozenge (33.3%) or gum (18.8%). In summary, NPs may provide smokers with a more satisfying alternative nicotine source as compared to the reference NRTs. Study Registry/Registered Trial No: ISRCTN/ISRCTN65708311.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, HLTH CONS SMOK 50 YE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, RCGP POS STAT US EL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, NIC SMOK TOB HARM RE
  • [4] Chemical characterization of tobacco-free "modern" oral nicotine pouches and their position on the toxicant and risk continuums
    Azzopardi, David
    Liu, Chuan
    Murphy, James
    [J]. DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 45 (05) : 2246 - 2254
  • [5] Nicotine Addiction
    Benowitz, Neal L.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (24) : 2295 - 2303
  • [6] Benowitz Neal L, 2009, Handb Exp Pharmacol, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_2
  • [7] An approach for the extract generation and toxicological assessment of tobacco-free 'modern' oral nicotine pouches
    Bishop, E.
    East, N.
    Bozhilova, S.
    Santopietro, S.
    Smart, D.
    Taylor, M.
    Meredith, S.
    Baxter, A.
    Breheny, D.
    Thorne, D.
    Gaca, M.
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 145
  • [8] Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers
    Chaiton, Michael
    Diemert, Lori
    Cohen, Joanna E.
    Bondy, Susan J.
    Selby, Peter
    Philipneri, Anne
    Schwartz, Robert
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):
  • [9] Pharmacokinetics of a nicotine polacrilex lozenge
    Choi, JH
    Dresler, CM
    Norton, MR
    Strahs, KR
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (05) : 635 - 644
  • [10] Snus: a compelling harm reduction alternative to cigarettes
    Clarke, Elizabeth
    Thompson, Keith
    Weaver, Sarah
    Thompson, Joseph
    O'Connell, Grant
    [J]. HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (01)