Evolution of Organisational Structure and Capabilities in Internationalising Banks The CEE Operations of UniCredit's Vienna Office

被引:13
作者
Ambos, Tina C. [1 ]
Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. [1 ]
Ambos, Bjoern [1 ]
Brenner, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Inst Int Mkt & Management, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
MANAGEMENT; ALIGNMENT; DYNAMICS; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.lrp.2009.09.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cross-border integration is the central management issue for banks that expand internationally, and this is especially true in Central and Eastern Europe, where the pace of internationalisation through mergers and acquisitions has been rapid. A critical challenge in cross-border integration is aligning a multinational company's formal organizational structure with the distribution of capabilities across its subsidiary units, and this issue is explored by tracking the co-evolution of organizational structure and capabilities during the internationalisation of a large banking network into this region. Our focus is the Vienna head office of Bank Austria Creditanstalt, which was acquired first by HypoVereinsbank (Germany) and then UniCredit (Italy). Despite its formal role being downgraded during these changes, the unit continued to develop its distinctive capabilities. The key insight our article offers is that managing cross-border integration is not simply about recognizing the value of the distinctive capabilities of individual units and designing formal structures that successfully align with them. It is also about understanding the need for dynamic interaction between formal corporate structure and individual units' desires to retain power and influence, which have significant implications for the development of their organizational capabilities. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 653
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Innovation and control in the multinational firm: A comparison of political and contingency approaches [J].
Ambos, Bjoern ;
Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (05) :473-486
[2]   Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers [J].
Ambos, Tina C. ;
Ambos, Bjoern ;
Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 15 (03) :294-312
[3]   STRUCTURAL SOURCES OF INTRAORGANIZATIONAL POWER - A THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS [J].
ASTLEY, WG ;
SACHDEVA, PS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (01) :104-113
[4]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[5]  
Bartlett C.A., 1989, Managing across borders: The transnational solution
[6]  
BEER M, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P158
[7]   Strategic management as organizational learning: Developing fit and alignment through a disciplined process [J].
Beer, M ;
Voelpel, SC ;
Leibold, M ;
Tekie, EB .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2005, 38 (05) :445-465
[8]   How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost [J].
Birkinshaw, J .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1996, 27 (03) :467-495
[9]   Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies [J].
Birkinshaw, J ;
Hood, N .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (04) :773-795
[10]  
Burt R.S., 1992, STRUCTURAL HOLES