Forecasting volatility under fractality, regime-switching, long memory and student-t innovations

被引:39
作者
Lux, Thomas
Morales-Arias, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Dept Econ, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
关键词
Multiplicative volatility models; Long memory; Student-t innovations; International volatility forecasting; MULTIFRACTAL MODEL; STOCK-MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2010.03.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The Markov-switching Multifractal model of asset returns with Student-t innovations (MSM-t henceforth) is introduced as an extension to the Markov-switching Multifractal model of asset returns (MSM). The MSM-t can be estimated via Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and volatility forecasting can be performed via Bayesian updating (ML) or best linear forecasts (GMM). Monte Carlo simulations show that using GMM plus linear forecasts leads to minor losses in efficiency compared to optimal Bayesian forecasts based on ML estimates. The forecasting capability of the MSM-t model is evaluated empirically in a comprehensive panel forecasting analysis with three different cross-sections of assets at the country level (all-share equity indices, bond indices and real estate security indices). Empirical forecasts of the MSM-t model are compared to those obtained from its Gaussian counterparts and other volatility models of the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) family. In terms of mean absolute errors (mean squared errors), the MSM-t (Gaussian MSM) dominates all other models at most forecasting horizons for the various asset classes considered. Furthermore, forecast combinations obtained from the MSM and (Fractionally Integrated) GARCH models provide an improvement upon forecasts from single models. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2676 / 2692
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Gamma stochastic volatility models [J].
Abraham, B ;
Balakrishna, N ;
Sivakumar, R .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2006, 25 (03) :153-171
[2]   Persistence in forecasting performance and conditional combination strategies [J].
Aiolfi, Marco ;
Timmermann, Allan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 135 (1-2) :31-53
[3]  
ANDERSEN T, 2005, 05011 PIER
[4]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[5]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[6]   Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high-frequency data and realized volatilities [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Meddahi, N .
ECONOMETRICA, 2005, 73 (01) :279-296
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Journal of Empirical Finance
[8]   Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity [J].
Baillie, RT ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Mikkelsen, HO .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1996, 74 (01) :3-30
[9]   Generalized Levinson-Durbin and Burg algorithms [J].
Brockwell, PJ ;
Dahlhaus, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2004, 118 (1-2) :129-149
[10]  
Brockwell PJ., 1991, TIME SERIES THEORY M