Disposition effect, demographics and risk taking

被引:0
作者
Oreng, Mariana [1 ]
Yoshinaga, Claudia Emiko [1 ]
Eid Junior, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola Adm Empresas Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Individual investors; Disposition effect; Investor behaviour; Behavioural finance; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; PROSPECT-THEORY; INVESTORS; OVERCONFIDENCE; SOPHISTICATION; RELUCTANT; DECISION; WINNERS; REALIZE; LOSSES;
D O I
10.1108/RAUSP-08-2019-0164
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to investigate the association of demographic characteristics, market conditions and risk taking with the disposition effect using data on Brazilian individual investors. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a unique data set with monthly data fromJune 2007 to February 2017 provided by one of the largest asset management firms in Brazil. This paper computes the proportion of gains realized and the proportion of losses realized to see if investors incur the disposition effect. This paper then performs logistic regressions to verify the association between investors' disposition effects and demographic and portfolio characteristics. This paper analyses the prevalence of cognitive biases depending on market conditions (bull or bearmarkets) and include regressions by asset class as robustness checks. Findings - This paper finds evidence that risk averse investors are more prone to the disposition effect, male subjects are less prone to this cognitive bias and age is not associatedwith the disposition effect. This paper observes that the tendency to incur the disposition effect decreases during bull markets but increases during bear markets. Also, this paper finds that sophisticated investors aremore prone to sellingwinning assets and holding on to losses. Research limitations/implications - First, paper gains and losses are based on the highest and lowest prices of the month and not on the price at the moment the sale occurred. Second, this paper had access only to end-of-month information, not to actual daily trading records. Third, because the data set relates to individual investors who trade investment funds, this paper cannot determine whether firm size is associated with the disposition effect. Fourth, age may not necessarily be a proxy for investor experience, so one should interpret the lack of significance for age in terms of generational differences. Practical implications - This paper demonstrates that the disposition effect is prevalent even among wealthier and more educated investors with delegated asset classes. This paper also presents evidence on the association between demographic characteristics and cognitive biases considering a liquidity-constrained, highly volatile and developing market. Social implications - This paper demonstrates that gender is an important characteristic to understand cognitive biases and that investor sophistication may not necessarily be an attenuation factor for the disposition effect in a liquidity-constrained market. Originality/value - This is the first study to analyse the role of demographic characteristics and risk taking to explain the disposition effect using real information at the individual level about Brazilian investors. It is also the first to analyse the intensity of cognitive biases during bull and bearmarkets in the Brazilian economy.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 233
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Cut your losses and let your profits run: How shifting feelings of personal responsibility reverses the disposition effect [J].
Aspara, Jaakko ;
Hoffmann, Arvid O. I. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2015, 8 :18-24
[2]   Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment [J].
Barber, BM ;
Odean, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :261-292
[3]   What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation [J].
Barberis, Nicholas ;
Xiong, Wei .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 64 (02) :751-784
[4]   The Extent to Which Professional Advice Can Reduce the Disposition Effect: An Emerging Market Study [J].
Bashall, James ;
Willows, Gizelle D. ;
West, Darron .
JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKET FINANCE, 2018, 17 (02) :229-249
[5]   Are Investors Really Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? Trading Responses to Past Returns and the Disposition Effect [J].
Ben-David, Itzhak ;
Hirshleifer, David .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (08) :2485-2532
[6]  
Brown Philip., 2006, INT REV FINANC, V6, P43, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-2443.2007.00059.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2443.2007.00059.X]
[7]   Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis [J].
Byrnes, JP ;
Miller, DC ;
Schafer, WD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (03) :367-383
[8]   Measuring the Financial Sophistication of Households [J].
Calvet, Laurent E. ;
Campbell, John Y. ;
Sodini, Paolo .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :393-398
[9]   Looking for Someone to Blame: Delegation, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Disposition Effect [J].
Chang, Tom Y. ;
Solomon, David H. ;
Westerfield, Mark M. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2016, 71 (01) :267-302
[10]   An examination of the relationship between the disposition effect and gender, age, the traded security, and bull-bear market conditions [J].
Cheng, Teng Yuan ;
Lee, Chun I. ;
Lin, Chao Hsien .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2013, 21 :195-213