The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases

被引:56
作者
MacColl, GA
Rossouw, PE
Titley, KC
Yamin, C
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Paediat Dent, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70297-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to test the effects on the shear bond strength by sandblasting bracket base surfaces, reducing base surface area, and etching enamel with various acid types. Four different base sizes, used as either standard (untreated), sandblasted or microetched were bonded with Phase II resin (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc.) in four groups of 12 bovine enamel specimens after enamel etching with phosphoric acid gel (37%), 37% phosphoric acid aqueous solution, 10% maleic acid gel, or 10% maleic acid aqueous solution. Storage of samples was for 7 days in distilled water at room temperature before shear bond testing with an Instron universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Statistical analyses included the analysis of variance, the Student t lest, and the Chi-square test at p < 0.05. An increase in shear bond strength was associated with sandblasting and microetching of foil-mesh bases far all base sizes to < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in shear bond strength existed between the three larger base sizes, which indicated that shear bond strength is independent of surface area between 6.82 and 12.35 mm(2), a reduction in bond strength was associated with the reduction of base surface area from 6.82 to 2.38 mm(2) (p <. 0.05). There appears to be no need to increase base surface area beyond 6.82 mm(2). Aqueous maleic acid (10%) etching of the enamel was associated with the highest shear bond strength, with no statistically significant difference between the other three acids used.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Akin N, 1991, Fortschr Kieferorthop, V52, P310, DOI 10.1007/BF02166732
  • [2] Buonocore M. G., 1955, J DENT RES, V34, P849, DOI DOI 10.1177/00220345550340060801
  • [3] Cavina R A, 1977, Br J Orthod, V4, P29
  • [4] DEIDRICH P, 1983, FORTSCHR KEIFERORTHO, V44, P298
  • [5] FINN RA, 1978, C CRAN RES ANN ARB C
  • [6] CORRELATION STUDY OF INCISIVE BITING FORCES WITH AGE, SEX, AND ANTERIOR OCCLUSION
    GARNER, LD
    KOTWAL, NS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1973, 52 (04) : 698 - 702
  • [7] Glatz E., 1985, AM J ORTHOD, V87, P87
  • [8] Gorelick L, 1979, J Clin Orthod, V13, P39
  • [9] GRAF H, 1974, HELV ODONTOL ACTA, V18, P7
  • [10] FUNCTIONAL-STATE, BITE FORCE AND POSTURAL MUSCLE-ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANT BRIDGES
    HARALDSON, T
    CARLSSON, GE
    INGERVALL, B
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1979, 37 (04) : 195 - 206