A Retrospective Study of Factors Contributing to Anchorage Loss in Upper Premolar Extraction Cases

被引:5
作者
Su, H. [1 ]
Xu, K. [2 ]
Han, B. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Chen, G. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Xu, T. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Pacific, Arthur A Dugoni Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Natl Engn Lab Digital & Mat Technol Stomatol & Bei, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, Beijing 22 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anchorage loss; incisor; molar height ratio; maxillary first molars; regression; tip; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; EN-MASSE RETRACTION; MAXILLARY; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.4103/njcp.njcp_1791_21
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Anchorage control is one of the components in the treatment of extraction cases. However, what determines more or less anchorage loss is still an unanswered question. Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the most important factors contributing to the anchorage loss of maxillary first molars in premolar extraction cases. Materials and Methods: The study included 726 upper premolar extraction cases, including 214 male patients and 512 female patients, and the mean age was 14.4 +/- 4.5 years old (range: 9-45). Factors including physiological characteristics, treatment mechanics, and cephalometric variables were collected and their influences on the angulation changes of maxillary first molars were analyzed. Results: The mean angulation change of maxillary first molar after treatment was 2.81 degrees(mesial tipping). The change of UM/PP showed a statistically significant difference in different sex (male 3.84 degrees +/- 5.26 degrees vs female 2.38 degrees +/- 5.10 degrees), age (adult -0.05 degrees +/- 4.73 degrees vs teenager 3.46 degrees +/- 5.07 degrees), and molar relationship (Class II 3.28 degrees +/- 5.15 degrees vs Class I 2.36 degrees +/- 5.19 degrees). There are six variables accounted in the regression analysis (R = 0.608, R-2 = 37.0%). Among them, the pre-treatment molar tipping (Standardized Coefficients: -0.65) and the pre-treatment incisor/molar height ratio (Standardized Coefficients: -0.27) were the most important factors influencing anchorage loss during treatment. Conclusion: Compared with treatment-related factors, the patient's physiological characteristics play a more important role in anchorage loss. The pre-treatment angulation of the maxillary first molar is the most influential factor in changes to maxillary molar angulation, which are often predisposing anchorage loss.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 669
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Antoszewska-Smith, Joanna ;
Sarul, Michal ;
Lyczek, Jan ;
Konopka, Tomasz ;
Kawala, Beata .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (03) :440-455
[2]   Effectiveness of anchorage with temporary anchorage devices during anterior maxillary tooth retraction: A randomized clinical trial [J].
Barthelemi, Stephane ;
Desoutter, Alban ;
Souare, Fatoumata ;
Cuisinier, Frederic .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 49 (05) :279-285
[3]  
Chen CY, 2019, PEDIATR DENT, V41, P9
[4]   Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign [J].
Dai, Fan-Fan ;
Xu, Tian-Min ;
Shu, Guang .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2019, 89 (05) :679-687
[5]   Effectiveness of the transpalatal arch in controlling orthodontic anchorage in maxillary premolar extraction cases: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Diar-Bakirly, Samira ;
Feres, Murilo Fernando Neuppmann ;
Saltaji, Humam ;
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
El-Bialy, Tarek .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2017, 87 (01) :147-158
[6]  
Iseri H, 1996, EUR J ORTHODONT, V18, P245
[7]   Transition of molar relationships in different skeletal growth patterns [J].
Kim, YE ;
Nanda, RS ;
Sinha, PK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 121 (03) :280-290
[8]  
Klontz H A, 1996, Semin Orthod, V2, P254, DOI 10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80025-9
[9]   Influence of patient age and sex on orthodontic treatment: Evaluations of Begg lightwire, standard edgewise, and straightwire techniques [J].
McKinney, JR ;
Harris, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 120 (05) :530-541
[10]  
Melsen Birte, 2017, Orthod Fr, V88, P35, DOI 10.1051/orthodfr/2016052