Techno-economic evaluation of thermal treatment, ozonation and sonication for the reduction of wastewater biomass volume before aerobic or anaerobic digestion

被引:108
作者
Salsabil, M. R. [2 ]
Laurent, J. [1 ]
Casellas, M. [1 ]
Dagot, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limoges, ENSIL, F-87068 Limoges, France
[2] Mashad High Educ & Res Inst, Mashhad, Iran
关键词
Aerobic digestion; Anaerobic digestion; Ultrasound; Ozone; Low temperature; Sludge reduction; EXCESS SLUDGE PRODUCTION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; ULTRASONIC TREATMENT; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; THERMOCHEMICAL PRETREATMENT; BIOLOGICAL SLUDGE; ORGANIC-MATTER; DISINTEGRATION; MINIMIZATION; BIODEGRADABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.054
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aerobic and anaerobic digestions were compared with different sludge reduction processes such as ultrasonic, ozone, and thermal treatments. Each treatment was tested under the following conditions to improve batch aerobic or anaerobic digestion: ultrasound (200, 000 kJ kgTS(0)(-1)), thermal (40 degrees C, 60 degrees C, 90 degrees C for 90 min, 120 degrees C 15 min, 1 bar), and ozonation (0.1 gO(3) gTS(0)(-1)). The different pretreatments induced organic matter solubilisation and intrinsic sludge reduction (total suspended solids): ultrasound (47%), thermal 90 degrees C (16%), ozone (15%), thermal 60 degrees C (9%), thermal 40 degrees C (5%), autoclave (120 degrees C) (4.2%). TSS (and also VSS) solubilisation were found to be highly correlated to the pretreatment ability to break the flocs rather than to specific energy input. The total values of TSS reduction ranged from 57% to 71% under aerobic conditions and from 66% to 86% under anaerobic conditions. TSS solubilisation after pretreatment can be considered as a predictive parameter of sludge volume reduction enhancement after aerobic or anaerobic digestion while specific energy input did not show anything or negligible impact. In our experimental conditions, ultrasound and ozone led to the best TSS removal improvement after both aerobic (30% and 20%) and anaerobic digestion (20%). Ultrasonic and ozone pretreatments prior to aerobic or anaerobic digestion led to the best reduction of the specific energy required for removing I kg of TSS compared to the control. Anaerobic digestion was globally more effective (compare to aerobic digestion) in enhancing sludge production reduction. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 333
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Ozonation of wastewater sludge for reduction and recycling [J].
Ahn, KH ;
Park, KY ;
Maeng, SK ;
Hwang, JH ;
Lee, JW ;
Song, KG ;
Choi, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (10) :71-77
[2]   Enzymatic, mechanical and thermal pre-treatment of surplus sludge [J].
Barjenbruch, M ;
Kopplow, O .
ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 7 (03) :715-720
[3]   Thermal hydrolysate as a carbon source for denitrification [J].
Barlindhaug, J ;
Odegaard, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 33 (12) :99-108
[4]   Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability [J].
Bougrier, C. ;
Albasi, C. ;
Delgenes, J. P. ;
Carrere, H. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2006, 45 (08) :711-718
[5]   Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment [J].
Bougrier, C ;
Carrère, H ;
Delgenès, JP .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2005, 106 (02) :163-169
[6]  
BOUGRIER C, 2005, THESIS U MONTPELLIER
[7]   Understanding the mechanisms of thermal disintegrating treatment in the reduction of sludge production [J].
Camacho, P ;
Ginestet, P ;
Audic, JM .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (10-11) :235-245
[8]   Experimental study on sludge reduction by ultrasound [J].
Cao, X. Q. ;
Chen, J. ;
Cao, Y. L. ;
Zhu, J. Y. ;
Hao, X. D. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 54 (09) :87-93
[9]  
Chiu YC, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V36, P155, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00681-1
[10]   Minimization of sludge production in biological processes: an alternative solution for the problem of sludge disposal [J].
Deleris, S ;
Geaugey, V ;
Camacho, P ;
Debellefontaine, H ;
Paul, E .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (10) :63-70