Feedback training induces a bias for detecting happiness or fear in facial expressions that generalises to a novel task

被引:12
作者
Griffiths, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Jarrold, Chris [1 ]
Penton-Voak, Ian S. [1 ]
Munafo, Marcus R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, MRC IEU, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, UK Ctr Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Emotion; Intervention; Perception; Sensitivity; Bias; EMOTION RECOGNITION; VIOLENT OFFENDERS; MAJOR DEPRESSION; SOCIAL ANXIETY; RESPONSE BIAS; METAANALYSIS; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; BEHAVIOR; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.007
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Many psychological disorders are characterised by insensitivities or biases in the processing of subtle facial expressions of emotion. Training using expression morph sequences which vary the intensity of expressions may be able to address such deficits. In the current study participants were shown expressions from either happy or fearful intensity morph sequences, and trained to detect the target emotion (e.g., happy in the happy sequence) as being present in low intensity expressions. Training transfer was tested using a six alternative forced choice emotion labelling task with varying intensity expressions, which participants completed before and after training. Training increased false alarms for the target emotion in the transfer task. Hit rate for the target emotion did not increase once adjustment was made for the increase in false alarms. This suggests that training causes a bias for detecting the target emotion which generalises outside of the training task. However it does not increase accuracy for detecting the target emotion. The results are discussed in terms of the training's utility in addressing different types of emotion processing deficits in psychological disorders. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 957
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, KAROLINSKA DIRECTED
[2]   The misclassification of facial expressions in generalised social phobia [J].
Bell, C. ;
Bourke, C. ;
Colhoun, H. ;
Carter, F. ;
Frampton, C. ;
Porter, R. .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2011, 25 (02) :278-283
[3]   The Effectiveness of Training to Improve Person Perception Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle ;
Andrzejewski, Susan A. ;
Hill, Krista M. .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 34 (06) :483-498
[4]   Processing of facial emotion expression in major depression: a review [J].
Bourke, Cecilia ;
Douglas, Katie ;
Porter, Richard .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 44 (08) :681-696
[5]   Facial expressions of emotion (KDEF): Identification under different display-duration conditions [J].
Calvo, Manuel G. ;
Lundqvist, Daniel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 40 (01) :109-115
[6]   Outcomes, moderators, and mediators of empathic-emotion recognition training for complex conduct problems in childhood [J].
Dadds, Mark Richard ;
Cauchi, Avril Jessica ;
Wimalaweera, Subodha ;
Hawes, David John ;
Brennan, John .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 199 (03) :201-207
[7]   Individual differences in perceptual sensitivity and response bias in anxiety: Evidence from emotional faces [J].
Frenkel, Tahl I. ;
Lamy, Dominique ;
Algom, Daniel ;
Bar-Haim, Yair .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2009, 23 (04) :688-700
[8]   Attention bias modification for social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Heeren, Alexandre ;
Mogoase, Cristina ;
Philippot, Pierre ;
McNally, Richard J. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2015, 40 :76-90
[9]   Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis [J].
Marsh, Abigail A. ;
Blair, R. J. R. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2008, 32 (03) :454-465
[10]   Increasing Recognition of Happiness in Ambiguous Facial Expressions Reduces Anger and Aggressive Behavior [J].
Penton-Voak, Ian S. ;
Thomas, Jamie ;
Gage, Suzanne H. ;
McMurran, Mary ;
McDonald, Sarah ;
Munafo, Marcus R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (05) :688-697