Is Neonatal Risk From Vasa Previa Preventable? The 20-year Experience From a Single Medical Center

被引:41
作者
Smorgick, Noam [1 ]
Tovbin, Yosef [1 ]
Ushakov, Fred [1 ]
Vaknin, Zvi [1 ]
Barzilay, Bernard [2 ]
Herman, Arie [1 ]
Maymon, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Dept Neonatal Intens Care, Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
prenatal screening; vasa previa; ultrasound; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; COLOR DOPPLER; UMBILICAL-CORD; SONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; INSERTION;
D O I
10.1002/jcu.20665
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Background. Vasa previa is a rare condition associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality that may be diagnosed prenatally using transvaginal sonography. The aim of this study was to assess the prenatal detection of vasa previa and its subsequent impact on neonatal outcomes in two 10-year periods (1988-1997 versus 1998-2007). Method. Retrospective review of all cases of vasa previa. Data on obstetrical history, modes of conception, sonographic scans, delivery mode, and neonatal outcome were retrieved and recorded. Result. There were 19 pregnancies (21 neonates) with confirmed vasa previa (overall incidence of 1.7/10,000 deliveries). Vasa previa were diagnosed prenatally in 10 (52.6%) cases. In cases without prenatal diagnosis, there was a higher proportion of neonates with 1' Apgar score <= 5 and cord blood pH <7 compared with cases diagnosed prenatally (66.7% versus 10%, p < 0.05, and 33.3% versus 0%, p < 0.05, respectively). The prenatal detection rate of vasa previa increased from 25 to 60% between the 2 time periods (p > 0.05), whereas perinatal mortality and 1' Apgar scores <= 5 decreased from 25 to 0% and from 50 to 33.3% (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Prenatal sonographic screening using targeted scans for vasa previa in women at risk or as part of routine mid-gestation scanning may significantly impact its obstetric manifestations. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 38:118-122, 2010; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20665
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 122
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of vasa praevia and analysis of risk factors [J].
Baulies, S. ;
Maiz, N. ;
Munoz, A. ;
Torrents, M. ;
Echevarria, M. ;
Serra, B. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2007, 27 (07) :595-599
[2]   Vasa previa - Prenatal diagnosis and evaluation with 3-dimensional sonography and power angiography [J].
Canterino, JC ;
Mondestin-Sorrentino, M ;
Muench, MV ;
Feld, S ;
Baum, JD ;
Fernandez, CO .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (05) :721-724
[3]   Vasa previa: Prenatal diagnosis, natural evolution, and clinical outcome [J].
Lee, W ;
Lee, VL ;
Kirk, JS ;
Sloan, CT ;
Smith, RS ;
Comstock, CH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (04) :572-576
[4]   Antenatal diagnosis of velamentous umbilical cord insertion and vasa previa with color Doppler imaging [J].
Nomiyama, M ;
Toyota, Y ;
Kawano, H .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :426-429
[5]  
Oyelese K O, 1999, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V54, P138, DOI 10.1097/00006254-199902000-00024
[6]   A strategy for reducing the mortality rate from vasa previa using transvaginal sonography with color Doppler [J].
Oyelese, KO ;
Schwärzler, P ;
Coates, S ;
Sanusi, FA ;
Hamid, R ;
Campbell, S .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :434-438
[7]   Vasa previa: The impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes [J].
Oyelese, Y ;
Catanzarite, V ;
Prefumo, F ;
Lashley, S ;
Schachter, M ;
Tovbin, Y ;
Goldstein, V ;
Smulian, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) :937-942
[8]   In vitro fertilization is a risk factor for vasa previa [J].
Schachter, M ;
Tovbin, Y ;
Arieli, S ;
Friedler, S ;
Ron-El, R ;
Sherman, D .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) :642-643
[9]   Prenatal detection of velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: a prospective color Doppler ultrasound study [J].
Sepulveda, W ;
Rojas, I ;
Robert, JA ;
Schnapp, C ;
Alcalde, JL .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 21 (06) :564-569