Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Favorable Early Outcomes With a Next-Generation Transcatheter Heart Valve in a Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) using a new-generation TAVR device. BACKGROUND A bicuspid AS is often considered a relative contraindication to TAVR. Although initial reports have demonstrated feasibility using early-generation devices, outcomes have not matched those seen with tricuspid AS. Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) has been particularly problematic. METHODS We collected baseline characteristics, procedural data, and 30-day clinical follow-up findings from 8 centers in Europe and Canada that had performed TAVR in bicuspid AS using the SAPIEN 3 valve. RESULTS 51 patients underwent TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 valve. Patient mean age was 76.2 +/- 9.3 years and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality scores were 5.2 +/- 3.7%. Bicuspid valve types were: type 0, 11.8%; type 1, 82.3%; and type 2, 1.9%. There were no cases of valve embolization or need for a second valve. Post-dilation was performed in 7.8%. The mean aortic gradient decreased from 49.4 +/- 16.0 mm Hg to 11.2 +/- 4.7 mm Hg. Post-implantation AR was none/trivial in 63% and mild in 37%. There were no cases of moderate or severe AR. At 30-day follow-up, there were 2 deaths (3.9%), 2 major vascular complications, and 12 patients (23.5%) required pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS TAVR in bicuspid AS using a new-generation device was feasible and effective with favorable valve performance and no cases of moderate or severe AR. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.