Water mist suppression of a turbulent line fire

被引:31
作者
White, James P. [1 ]
Verma, Salman [1 ]
Keller, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
Hao, Ailing [1 ]
Trouve, Arnaud [1 ]
Marshall, Andre W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Fire Protect Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Koffel Associates Inc, Columbia, MD 21045 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CFD; Combustion efficiency; FireFOAM; Suppression; Water mist; NON-PREMIXED FLAMES; DIFFUSION FLAME; CO-FLOW; DROPLET VAPORIZATION; SOOT INCEPTION; EXTINCTION; COMBUSTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.014
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present study seeks to measure suppression effects in a canonical experimental configuration, featuring the exposure of a buoyant, turbulent, methane-fueled diffusion flame to a co-flowing oxidizer laden with a fine water mist (Sauter mean diameter of 6.6 mu m). The carefully designed facility features well-characterized inlet and boundary conditions suitable for accurate representation in numerical simulations. Suppression performance is kmonitored via combustion efficiency (eta(comb)), measured using species-based calorimetry techniques. As the mass fraction of water mist in the oxidizer (Y-wm(ox)) is increased, visible flame emissions are reduced due to diminishing soot incandescence coupled with a reduction in visibility due to Mie scattering effects in the mist. Global flame extinction is observed at Y-wm(ext) = 0.093, a condition corresponding to 44% less water mass in the oxidizer than required for extinction due to dilution effects alone, suggesting that significant latent cooling effects contribute to the observed extinction limit. Despite visually observed suppression effects, eta(comp) approximate to 1 across all tested Y-wm(ox) decreasing abruptly only at the extinction limit. Numerical simulations of the experiments are conducted using FireFOAM, an open source large eddy simulation solver incorporating a flame extinction model based on a critical Damkohler number and a flame reignition treatment based on a critical flame temperature. Though numerical results show qualitative agreement with the observed extinction behavior, the simulated extinction limit of Y-wm(ext) = 0.20 significantly exceeds that measured in the experiment, but is itself consistent with an extinction limit due only to dilution effects.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 713
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   DROPLET VAPORIZATION MODEL FOR SPRAY COMBUSTION CALCULATIONS [J].
ABRAMZON, B ;
SIRIGNANO, WA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1989, 32 (09) :1605-1618
[2]  
Adiga K., FIRE SAF J, V42
[3]  
Ananth R., 2004, HAL OPT TECHN WORK C, P1
[4]   Ultra-fine water mist extinction dynamics of a co-flow diffusion flame [J].
Ananth, Ramagopal ;
Mowrey, Richard C. .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 180 (09) :1659-1692
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, THESIS
[6]  
Blanchard E., 2011, Fire Safety Science-Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium, IAFSS, P119
[7]  
Chai J., 2006, Handbook of numerical heat transfer, P297
[8]   Mechanisms of suppressing cup-burner flame with water vapor [J].
Cong BeiHua ;
Liao GuangXuan .
SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES E-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 51 (08) :1222-1231
[9]   Soot inception temperature and the carbonization rate of precursor particles [J].
Dobbins, RA .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2002, 130 (03) :204-214
[10]   THE EFFECT OF FLAME STRUCTURE ON SOOT-PARTICLE INCEPTION IN-DIFFUSION FLAMES [J].
DU, J ;
AXELBAUM, RL .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1995, 100 (03) :367-375