Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

被引:153
作者
Alfonso, Jose F.
Fernandez-Vega, Luis
Baamonde, M. Begona
Mont-Mico, Robert
机构
[1] Inst Oftalmol Fernandez Vega, Oviedo 33012, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Oviedo, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Opt, Fac Phys, Valencia, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.034
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR +/- 0.004 (SD) and 0.019 +/- 0.020 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011 +/- 0.012 logMAR and 0.035 +/- 0.013 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P <.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P >.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   THROUGH FOCUS IMAGE QUALITY OF EYES IMPLANTED WITH MONOFOCAL AND MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES [J].
ARTAL, P ;
MARCOS, S ;
NAVARRO, R ;
MIRANDA, I ;
FERRO, M .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 34 (03) :772-779
[2]   History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens [J].
Davison, James A. ;
Simpson, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (05) :849-858
[3]  
GIMBEL HV, 1991, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V98, P881
[4]   Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens [J].
Hayashi, K ;
Hayashi, H ;
Nakao, F ;
Hayashi, F .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (11) :2011-2017
[5]   Characterization of visual phenomena with the Array multifocal intraocular lens [J].
Hunkeler, JD ;
Coffman, TM ;
Paugh, J ;
Lang, A ;
Smith, P ;
Tarantino, N .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (07) :1195-1204
[6]  
Jacobi FK, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P17
[7]   Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation - A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes [J].
Javitt, JC ;
Steinert, RF .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (11) :2040-+
[8]   QUALITY OF VISION THROUGH DIFFRACTIVE BIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES [J].
JAY, JL ;
CHAKRABARTI, HS ;
MORRISON, JD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 75 (06) :359-366
[9]   Modulation transfer function and pupil size in multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in vitro [J].
Kawamorita, T ;
Uozato, H .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (12) :2379-2385
[10]   Changes in pupil size induced by phacoemulsification and posterior chamber lens implantation: Consequences for multifocal lenses [J].
Koch, DD ;
Samuelson, SW ;
Villarreal, R ;
Haft, EA ;
Kohnen, T .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (05) :579-584