Network efficient topology for low power and lossy networks in smart corridor design using RPL

被引:2
作者
Garg, Sakshi [1 ]
Mehrotra, Deepti [1 ]
Pandey, Sujata [1 ]
Pandey, Hari Mohan [2 ]
机构
[1] Amity Univ, Noida, India
[2] Edge Hill Univ, Ormskirk, England
关键词
Routing protocol for low power and lossy networks; Expected transmission count; Packet delivery ratio; Power consumption; Traffic monitoring system; Advanced metering infrastructure; Electronic toll collection; IPV6 ROUTING PROTOCOL; INTERNET; LOAD; ENHANCEMENTS; SECURITY; THINGS; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1108/IJPCC-08-2020-0118
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to determine the network efficient topology for low power and lossy networks (LLNs) using routing protocol for LLN (RPL) with respect to the increase in network size and propose a novel approach to overcome the shortcomings of the existing models. Design/methodology/approach The authors have used Contiki OS/Cooja simulator to conduct experiments on primarily four topologies (star, bus/linear, ring/eclipse and random). They have implemented RPL protocol using Sky motes for each topology from 10, 20, 30 and up to 70 nodes. Consequently, after 24 h of experimentation, the readings have been noted and, alongside, a comprehensive comparative analysis has been performed based on the network density and metric parameters: packet delivery ratio (PDR), expected transmission (ETX) and power consumption. Further, a hybrid model is proposed where the additional factors of mobility, multiple sink and a combination of static and mobile nodes are introduced. The proposed model is then compared with the star model (all static nodes and star topology) and the dynamic model (all mobile nodes) to analyze the efficiency and network performance for different network sizes (28, 36, 38 and 44 nodes). The mobility is introduced using BonnMotion tool in Contiki OS. Findings Simulation results have shown that the star topology is most network efficient when compared with bus/linear, ring/eclipse and random topologies for low density and high scalable network. But when the same setup is compared with the proposed hybrid model, the proposed model shows a significant improvement and gives the best and efficient network performance with highest PDR (average improvement approximately 44.5%) and lowest ETX (average improvement approximately 49.5%) comparatively. Practical implications Also, these findings will benefit the deployment of smart devices used in advanced metering infrastructure, road side units and in various industrial applications such as traffic monitoring system, electronic toll collection and traffic analysis in the smart grid infrastructure. Originality/value The impact of topology is significant and detailed analysis is required to understand the impact of different topologies of the nodes in the network for the present and the future scenarios. As very few research studies have discussed this gap, this research paper is quintessential and shall open novel future potential direction. Also, the proposed approach of hybrid model with mobility has not been considered in the literature yet.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 436
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   Accessible review of internet of vehicle models for intelligent transportation and research gaps for potential future directions [J].
Garg, Sakshi ;
Mehrotra, Deepti ;
Pandey, Hari Mohan ;
Pandey, Sujata .
PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 14 (02) :978-1005
[22]   A Survey of Limitations and Enhancements of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks: A Focus on Core Operations [J].
Ghaleb, Baraq ;
Al-Dubai, Ahmed Y. ;
Ekonomou, Elias ;
Alsarhan, Ayoub ;
Nasser, Youssef ;
Mackenzie, Lewis M. ;
Boukerche, Azzedine .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2019, 21 (02) :1607-1635
[23]   Proposing a new method for improving RPL to support mobility in the Internet of things [J].
Hoghooghi, Samaneh ;
Javidan, Reza .
IET NETWORKS, 2020, 9 (02) :48-55
[24]   RPL: THE ROUTING STANDARD FOR THE INTERNET OF THINGS ... OR IS IT? [J].
Iova, Oana ;
Picco, Gian Pietro ;
Istomin, Timofei ;
Kiraly, Csaba .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2016, 54 (12) :16-22
[25]  
Jin-Ho Kim, 2010, 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC 2010), DOI 10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481044
[26]   A Comparative Review of Wireless Sensor Network Mote Technologies [J].
Johnson, Michael ;
Healy, Michael ;
van de Ven, Pepijn ;
Hayes, Martin J. ;
Nelson, John ;
Newe, Thomas ;
Lewis, Elfed .
2009 IEEE SENSORS, VOLS 1-3, 2009, :1439-1442
[27]  
Kalyani S, 2018, INT CONF ADV COMPU, P307
[28]   Survey on RPL enhancements: A focus on topology, security and mobility [J].
Kamgueu, Patrick Olivier ;
Nataf, Emmanuel ;
Ndie, Thomas Djotio .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 120 :10-21
[29]  
Kamgueu PO, 2015, 2015 IEEE 40TH LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (LCN WORKSHOPS), P789, DOI 10.1109/LCNW.2015.7365929
[30]   Evaluating routing metric composition approaches for QoS differentiation in low power and lossy networks [J].
Karkazis, Panagiotis ;
Trakadas, Panagiotis ;
Leligou, Helen C. ;
Sarakis, Lambros ;
Papaefstathiou, Ioannis ;
Zahariadis, Theodore .
WIRELESS NETWORKS, 2013, 19 (06) :1269-1284