Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment

被引:78
作者
Lehoux, Pascale
Williams-Jones, Bryn
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Grp Rech Interdisciplinaire Sante, Branch Centreville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Hlth Adm, Branch Centreville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Grp Rech Bioeth, Branch Centreville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Branch Centreville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
health technology assessment; HTA; ethics; social issues; values; policy making;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462307051513
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since its inception, the field of health technology assessment (HTA) has stressed the need for consideration of ethical and social issues. However, few concepts or analytic tools have been developed, and because of the complexity of the endeavor and a lack of integration of work already produced, such concepts remain difficult to apply in HTA. Objectives: Through a descriptive "map" of concepts, tools, and processes, we summarize the most tangible efforts on the part of HTA producers to address social and ethical issues. Methods: A literature review and content analysis of HTA reports in the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database enables a synthesis of the reflections on, initiatives around, and gaps in knowledge related to the integration of social and ethical issues in HTA. Results: We examine: (i) the aim of integrating ethical and social issues in HTA, (ii) the theoretical approaches used, (iii) the methods and processes applied, and (iv) the implications for HTA producers. We highlight two levels at which social and ethical issues can be considered: throughout the production process of HTA reports and as part of the organizational structure of HTA agencies. Conclusions: Given the profound societal changes that occur in relation to healthcare technology development, HTA producers have a responsibility to inform and enlighten technology-related public and policy debates. Fulfilling this role, though, requires that socioethical dimensions of technology and HTA are made explicit.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes [J].
Abelson, J ;
Forest, PG ;
Eyles, J ;
Smith, P ;
Martin, E ;
Gauvin, FP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (02) :239-251
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INTEGRATIVE APPROACH
[3]   A history of ISTAHC - A personal perspective on its first 10 years [J].
Banta, HD ;
Perry, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 13 (03) :430-453
[4]  
Burguess MM, 2003, J BIOETHIC INQ, V1, P4
[5]  
de Langavant G C, 2000, Community Genet, V3, P141
[6]   How can we help? From "sociology in" to "sociology of" bioethics [J].
De Vries, R .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2004, 32 (02) :279-+
[7]  
DROSTE S, 2003, METHODS INTEGRATION, V9
[8]  
Gallo P, 2004, POIESIS PRAX, V2, P103
[9]   Sociocultural and legal implications of creating and sustaining life through biomedical technology [J].
Garcia, SA .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 1996, 17 (04) :469-525
[10]   The policy analysis of 'values talk': lessons from Canadian health reform [J].
Giacomini, M ;
Hurley, J ;
Gold, I ;
Smith, P ;
Abelson, J .
HEALTH POLICY, 2004, 67 (01) :15-24