Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Scale for Children and Young People (CBTS-CYP) in a Turkish sample

被引:0
作者
Gormez, Vahdet [1 ]
cakiroglu, Suleyman [1 ]
Bikmazer, Alperen [1 ]
Stallard, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Hlth, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
behavioural cognitive therapy; children and adolescents; therapist competence; ASSESSING COMPETENCE; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1017/S1352465822000169
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) training is highly demanded by clinicians; however, a standardized competence assessment for professionals working with children and young people (CYP) can be problematic. Psychometric tools used for this purpose are typically adult oriented measures. Aim: The present study provides psychometric properties of the Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Scale for Children and Young People (CBTS-CYP) derived from a comparative analysis with the Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS). Method: The CBTS-CYP was used alongside CTS in a CBT supervision training course, consisting of a cohort of 51 therapists. A total of 36 audio/video recorded full CBT sessions were assessed for the purpose of determining CBT competence and adherence to the theory and model. The training involved a total of 80 hours of supervision in 10 meetings via an online videoconferencing platform between July 2020 and February 2021. Results: Face validity and inter-rater reliability of CBTS-CYP were high, with the intraclass correlation values being good (0.60-0.74) or excellent (0.74 and above); the correlations of each CBTS-CYP and CTS items were significant; internal consistency of the scale showed that Cronbach alpha values for total-scale and its two subdimensions were above .93. For a cut-off score of 55 out of 90, sensitivity reached 90.73% and specificity 90.73%. A score of 2 points or above from any single item could be considered as the second minimum criterion for competence. Conclusions: CBTS-CYP offers a valid and reliable scale to evaluate the competence and adherence quality of CBT sessions with children and adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 428
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS) in a Sample of Community Mental Health Clinicians [J].
Affrunti, Nicholas W. ;
Creed, Torrey A. .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (03) :642-655
[2]   Development of the cognitive therapy adherence and competence scale [J].
Barber, JP ;
Liese, BS ;
Abrams, MJ .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (02) :205-221
[3]   THE REVISED COGNITIVE THERAPY SCALE (CTS-R): PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES [J].
Blackburn, Ivy-Marie ;
James, Ian A. ;
Milne, Derek L. ;
Baker, Chris ;
Standart, Sally ;
Garland, Anne ;
Reichelt, F. Katharina .
BEHAVIOURAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2001, 29 (04) :431-446
[4]   A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and the role of interpersonal problems [J].
Borkovec, TD ;
Newman, MG ;
Pincus, AL ;
Lytle, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 70 (02) :288-298
[5]   The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses [J].
Butler, AC ;
Chapman, JE ;
Forman, EM ;
Beck, AT .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 26 (01) :17-31
[6]   Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training [J].
Fairburn, Christopher G. ;
Cooper, Zafra .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2011, 49 (6-7) :373-378
[7]  
Friedberg R., 2014, J PSYCHOL CLIN PSYCH, V1, P47
[8]  
Fuggle P., 2012, YOUNG PEOPLE FAMILIE
[9]   The Structure of Competence: Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale [J].
Goldberg, Simon B. ;
Baldwin, Scott A. ;
Merced, Kritzia ;
Caperton, Derek D. ;
Imel, Zac E. ;
Atkins, David C. ;
Creed, Torrey .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2020, 51 (01) :113-122
[10]   The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses [J].
Hofmann, Stefan G. ;
Asnaani, Anu ;
Vonk, Imke J. J. ;
Sawyer, Alice T. ;
Fang, Angela .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (05) :427-440