A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation

被引:89
作者
Dere, Kamer [1 ]
Sucullu, Ilker [2 ]
Budak, Ersel Tan
Yeyen, Suleyman
Filiz, Ali Ilker [2 ]
Ozkan, Sezai
Dagli, Guner
机构
[1] GATA Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Algol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] GATA Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; hemodynamics; midazolam; sedation; COMBINATION; ENDOSCOPY; RECOVERY; AGONISTS;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283347bfe
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective The intent of our study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on perioperative hemodynamics, sedation, pain, satisfaction and recovery scores during colonoscopy. Material and methods A total of 60 ASA I-II patients, between 20 and 80 years of age were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Midazolam 0.05 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl citrate 1 mu g kg(-1) were administered intravenously to cases in Group I (n=30). An initial loading dose of 1 mu g kg(-1) dexmedetomidine was administered intravenously in 10 min to cases in Group II (n=30) before the procedure and as a continuous infusion dose of 0.5 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) just before the procedure started. Also 1 mu g kg(-1) fentanyl citrate was administered intravenously immediately before the procedure. Peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo(2)), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores and colonoscopist satisfaction scores of the cases were recorded. Results Although statistically significant values were not detected between the two groups with regard to mean arterial pressure, in Group I heart rates were higher and Spo(2) scores were lower in a statistically significant manner. When the groups were compared with regard to RSS, the RSS scores of Group I at the 10th and 15th minutes were significantly lower than Group II. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups when compared with regard to NRS scores. Satisfaction scores were significantly lower in Group II. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine provides more efficient hemodynamic stability, higher Ramsay sedation scale scores, higher satisfaction scores and lower NRS scores in colonoscopies. According to our results we believe that dexmedetomidine can be used safely as a sedoanalgesic agent in colonoscopies. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:648-652
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 652
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
AANTAA R, 1993, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V37, P1
[2]   THE POSTANESTHESIA RECOVERY SCORE REVISITED [J].
ALDRETE, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (01) :89-91
[3]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .2. HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES [J].
BLOOR, BC ;
WARD, DS ;
BELLEVILLE, JP ;
MAZE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1134-1142
[4]   The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study [J].
Demiraran, Yavuz ;
Korkut, Esin ;
Tamer, Ali ;
Yorulmaz, Ilknur ;
Kocaman, Buket ;
Sezen, Gulbin ;
Akcan, Yusuf .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) :25-29
[5]   Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of medications used for moderate sedation [J].
Gan, Tong J. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2006, 45 (09) :855-869
[6]   Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data [J].
Gould, D ;
Kelly, D ;
Goldstone, L ;
Gammon, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2001, 10 (05) :697-705
[7]   Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part I - Crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers [J].
Hsu, YW ;
Cortinez, LI ;
Robertson, KM ;
Keifer, JC ;
Sum-Ping, ST ;
Moretti, EW ;
Young, CC ;
Wright, DR ;
MacLeod, DB ;
Somma, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (05) :1066-1076
[8]   Sole use of dexmedetomidine has limited utility for conscious sedation during outpatient colonoscopy [J].
Jalowiecki, P ;
Rudner, R ;
Gonciarz, M ;
Kawecki, P ;
Petelenz, M ;
Dziurdzik, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (02) :269-273
[9]   Clinical uses of α2-adrenergic agonists [J].
Kamibayashi, T ;
Maze, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (05) :1345-1349
[10]  
Özel AM, 2008, TURK J GASTROENTEROL, V19, P8