Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

被引:28
作者
Ballard, JL
Abou-Zamzam, AM
Teruya, TH
Bianchi, C
Petersen, FF
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2003.11.037
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate changes in quality of life and to compare conventional outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular and open retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Methods: Between October 2000 and May 2003, 129 patients underwent elective AAA repair, endovascular repair in 22 patients and open retroperitoneal repair in 107 patients. The Short-Form Health Survey, 12 items (SF-12) was administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year after discharge. Quality of life, hospital and intensive care unit stay, perioperative complications, discharge disposition, readmission, and hospital cost were statistically evaluated. Results: For the total group, significant differences were observed for both Physical Component Summary scores (P < .001) and Mental Component Summary scores (P = .001) between time points. There were no significant differences for either Component Summary score between open and endovascular procedures for any time period. Number of weeks required to return to baseline functional status was similar after either open or endovascular repair (7.22 vs 5.47 weeks, respectively; P = .09). Mean hospital and intensive care unit stay was 4.4 and 1 days, respectively, for open repair versus 1.9 and 0 days, respectively, for endovascular re air (P < .0001). No significant difference between groups was observed P in terms of perioperative complications, discharge disposition, or hospital readmission (P greater than or equal to .54). Mean total hospital cost for endovascular repair was 1.60 times that for open repair (mean difference, $11,662; P < .0001; 95% confidence interval, $17,799-$5525). Conclusions: Hospital stay is significantly shorter after endovascular AAA repair. However, hospital cost is almost twice that for open retroperitoneal repair. Perioperative complications, discharge disposition, and hospital readmission are not statistically different between the two groups. Effect on health-related quality of life is similar after either open retroperitoneal or endovascular AAA repair.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 801
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Aquino RV, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P521, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0521:QOLAIP>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Arko FR, 2003, J ENDOVASC THER, V10, P2, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0002:EALFOA>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Cost-effective aortic exposure: A retroperitoneal experience [J].
Ballard, JL ;
Yonemoto, H ;
Killeen, JD .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 14 (01) :1-5
[6]  
DARLING RC, 1992, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V33, P65
[7]   INFRARENAL ABDOMINAL AORTIC DISEASE - A REVIEW OF THE RETROPERITONEAL APPROACH [J].
GRACE, PA ;
BOUCHIERHAYES, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (01) :6-9
[8]  
LACROIX H, 1994, ACTA CHIR BELG, P1
[9]   Comparison of cognitive function and quality of life after endovascular or conventional aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Lloyd, AJ ;
Boyle, J ;
Bell, PRF ;
Thompson, MM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (04) :443-447
[10]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE FOLLOWING SURGERY FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM [J].
MAGEE, TR ;
SCOTT, DJ ;
DUNKLEY, A ;
JOHNSTON, JS ;
CAMPBELL, WB ;
BAIRD, RN ;
HORROCKS, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (10) :1014-1016