Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey

被引:97
作者
Reichman, Nancy E. [1 ]
Schwartz-Soicher, Ofira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Pediat, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
birth certificate; pregnancy; sensitivity; validity;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the accuracy of birth certificate data varies by risk factors and birth outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We reanalyzed data from a validation study of birth certificate data in New Jersey, focusing on subgroups of mothers according to marital status, age, race, ethnicity, English- language proficiency, prenatal care, transfer status, birthweight, and gestational age. RESULTS: Underreporting of birth certificate data elements varies by maternal characteristics ( particularly English- language proficiency), transfer status, and birth outcomes. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider subgroup variations in data quality when birth certificate data are used for research. Additional studies are needed to explore the sources of variation in data quality and to assess the quality for additional subgroups, across subgroups in other states, in low-risk populations, and of new data items that were introduced in the 2003 revision of the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth.
引用
收藏
页码:32.e1 / 32.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Validity of birth certificate data for the outcome of the previous pregnancy, Georgia, 1980-1995
    Adams, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 154 (10) : 883 - 888
  • [2] Perinatal epidemiologic research with, vital statistics data: Validity is the essential quality
    Ananth, CV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [3] THE QUALITY OF THE NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATA - A VALIDATION-STUDY IN NORTH-CAROLINA
    BUESCHER, PA
    TAYLOR, KP
    DAVIS, MH
    BOWLING, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (08) : 1163 - 1165
  • [4] Vital considerations for the use of vital statistics in obstetrical research
    Cahill, AG
    Macones, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) : 909 - 910
  • [5] Clark K, 1997, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V145, P68
  • [6] The computerized perinatal database: Are the data reliable?
    Costakos, D
    Love, LA
    Kirby, RS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1998, 15 (07) : 453 - 459
  • [7] Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.
    DiGiuseppe D.L.
    Aron D.C.
    Ranbom L.
    Harper D.L.
    Rosenthal G.E.
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2002, 6 (3) : 169 - 179
  • [8] How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.
    Dobie S.A.
    Baldwin L.M.
    Rosenblatt R.A.
    Fordyce M.A.
    Andrilla C.H.
    Hart L.G.
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1998, 2 (3) : 145 - 154
  • [9] Emery ES, 1997, PAEDIATR PERINAT EP, V11, P313
  • [10] Invited commentary: Using vital statistics databases for perinatal epidemiology: Does the quality go in before the name goes on?
    Kirby, RS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 154 (10) : 889 - 890