Mendelian randomization: estimation of inpatient hospital costs attributable to obesity

被引:2
作者
Dick, Katherine [1 ]
Schneider, John E. [1 ]
Briggs, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Lecomte, Pascal [3 ]
Regnier, Stephane A. [3 ]
Lean, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Avalon Hlth Econ, 26 Washington St,2nd Floor, Morristown, NJ 07960 USA
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England
[3] Novartis AG, WSJ-210-15-30-23, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Glasgow, Univ Ave, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Mendelian randomization; Obesity; Instrumental variables; Genetics; Economics; Healthcare utilization; BODY-MASS INDEX; HEALTH-CARE COSTS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; ECONOMIC BURDEN; RISK; ASSOCIATION; OVERWEIGHT; ADIPOSITY; VARIANTS; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1186/s13561-021-00314-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background Mendelian Randomization is a type of instrumental variable (IV) analysis that uses inherited genetic variants as instruments to estimate causal effects attributable to genetic factors. This study aims to estimate the impact of obesity on annual inpatient healthcare costs in the UK using linked data from the UK Biobank and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). Methods UK Biobank data for 482,127 subjects was linked with HES inpatient admission records, and costs were assigned to episodes of care. A two-stage least squares (TSLS) IV model and a TSLS two-part cost model were compared to a naive regression of inpatient healthcare costs on body mass index (BMI). Results The naive analysis of annual cost on continuous BMI predicted an annual cost of 21.61 pound [95% CI 20.33 pound - 22.89] pound greater cost per unit increase in BMI. The TSLS IV model predicted an annual cost of 14.36 pound [95% CI 0.31 pound - 28.42] pound greater cost per unit increase in BMI. Modelled with a binary obesity variable, the naive analysis predicted that obese subjects incurred 205.53 pound [95% CI 191.45 pound - 219.60] pound greater costs than non-obese subjects. The TSLS model predicted a cost 201.58 pound [95% CI 4.32 pound - 398.84] pound greater for obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects. Conclusions The IV models provide evidence for a causal relationship between obesity and higher inpatient healthcare costs. Compared to the naive models, the binary IV model found a slightly smaller marginal effect of obesity, and the continuous IV model found a slightly smaller marginal effect of a single unit increase in BMI.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Is BMI the best measure of obesity?
    Adab, Peymane
    Pallan, Miranda
    Whincup, Peter H.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 360
  • [2] Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years
    Afshin, Ashkan
    Forouzanfar, Mohammad H.
    Reitsma, Marissa B.
    Sur, Patrick
    Estep, Kara
    Lee, Alex
    Marczak, Laurie
    Mokdad, Ali H.
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    Naghavi, Mohsen
    Salama, Joseph S.
    Vos, Theo
    Abate, Kalkidan H.
    Abbafati, Cristiana
    Ahmed, Muktar B.
    Al-Aly, Ziyad
    Alkerwi, Ala'a
    Al-Raddadi, Rajaa
    Amare, Azmeraw T.
    Amberbir, Alemayehu
    Amegah, Adeladza K.
    Amini, Erfan
    Amrock, Stephen M.
    Anjana, Ranjit M.
    Arnlov, Johan
    Asayesh, Hamid
    Banerjee, Amitava
    Barac, Aleksandra
    Baye, Estifanos
    Bennett, Derrick A.
    Beyene, Addisu S.
    Biadgilign, Sibhatu
    Biryukov, Stan
    Bjertness, Espen
    Boneya, Dube J.
    Campos-Nonato, Ismael
    Carrero, Juan J.
    Cecilio, Pedro
    Cercy, Kelly
    Ciobanu, Liliana G.
    Cornaby, Leslie
    Damtew, Solomon A.
    Dandona, Lalit
    Dandona, Rakhi
    Dharmaratne, Samath D.
    Duncan, Bruce B.
    Eshrati, Babak
    Esteghamati, Alireza
    Feigin, Valery L.
    Fernandes, Joao C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (01) : 13 - 27
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, NHGRI EBI GWAS CATAL
  • [4] Comparison of risk factor associations in UK Biobank against representative, general population based studies with conventional response rates: prospective cohort study and individual participant meta-analysis
    Batty, G. David
    Gale, Catharine R.
    Kivimaki, Mika
    Deary, Ian J.
    Bell, Steven
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
  • [5] Development and Evaluation of a Genetic Risk Score for Obesity
    Belsky, Daniel W.
    Moffitt, Terrie E.
    Sugden, Karen
    Williams, Benjamin
    Houts, Renate
    McCarthy, Jeanette
    Caspi, Avshalom
    [J]. BIODEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 59 (01) : 85 - 100
  • [6] Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults
    Bhaskaran, Krishnan
    Douglas, Ian
    Forbes, Harriet
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Leon, David A.
    Smeeth, Liam
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 384 (9945) : 755 - 765
  • [7] The health care costs of childhood obesity in Australia: An instrumental variables approach
    Black, Nicole
    Hughes, Robert
    Jones, Andrew M.
    [J]. ECONOMICS & HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 1 - 13
  • [8] Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting
    Boef, Anna G. C.
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) : 496 - 511
  • [9] Sample size importantly limits the usefulness of instrumental variable methods, depending on instrument strength and level of confounding
    Boef, Anna G. C.
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    Vandenbroucke, Jan P.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (11) : 1258 - 1264
  • [10] Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation
    Bray, G. A.
    Kim, K. K.
    Wilding, J. P. H.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2017, 18 (07) : 715 - 723