Soil flushing of cresols contaminated soil: application of nonionic and ionic surfactants under different pH and concentrations

被引:15
作者
Gitipour, Saeid [1 ]
Narenjkar, Khadijeh [1 ]
Farvash, Emad Sanati [1 ]
Asghari, Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Grad Fac Environm, Tehran, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2014年 / 12卷
关键词
Contaminated soil; Cresols; SDS; Soil flushing; Surfactants; Triton X-100; REMEDIATION; SOLUBILIZATION; REMOVAL; PHENANTHRENE; DESORPTION; EFFICIENCY; SULFATE;
D O I
10.1186/s40201-014-0129-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, the viability of soil flushing on the removal of cresols (meta-, ortho-, and para-cresols) from contaminated soil has been investigated. High production and distribution of cresols in the environment indicate their potential for a widespread exposure to humans. The presence of these compounds in soil could cause a significant threat to environment, as they are toxic and refractory in nature. Cresols are persistent chemicals which are classified by the United State Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA) as Group C, possible human carcinogens. Soil flushing is one of the soil remediation technologies which could by applied for treatment of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Flushing of the contaminated soil samples was carried out by using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Triton X-100 surfactant solutions at the concentrations of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% (W/W). Three acidic, neutral, and alkaline environments were utilized by adjusting pH of the washing solutions at 3, 7 and 12 to evaluate the effect of washing environment in removing cresols. The results of this research denote that the highest removal efficiencies of 79.6% and 83.51% were achieved for m-cresol and total o- and p-cresols, respectively, under the alkaline environment of pH12 at 0.4% (W/W) SDS concentration. Regarding performance of Triton X-100, the removal efficiencies of 80.26% and 80.14% for the above cresols were attained under similar conditions. Hence, illustrating the effectiveness of surfactants in soil flushing remediation of cresols contaminated soil.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2005, CONT CLEAN TARG LEV
[12]   SOLUBILIZATION OF NONPOLAR COMPOUNDS BY NONIONIC SURFACTANT MICELLES [J].
JAFVERT, CT ;
VANHOOF, PL ;
HEATH, JK .
WATER RESEARCH, 1994, 28 (05) :1009-1017
[13]   Surfactant-soil interactions during surfactant-amended remediation of contaminated soils by hydrophobic organic compounds: A review [J].
Laha, Shonali ;
Tansel, Berrin ;
Ussawarujikulchai, Achara .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) :95-100
[14]  
Lee LS., 2007, INDOT GUIDANCE IN SI, DOI DOI 10.5703/1288284314230
[15]   Surfactant flushing remediation of toluene contaminated soil: Optimization with response surface methodology and surfactant recovery by selective oxidation with sulfate radicals [J].
Long, Anhua ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Lei, Yang .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 118 :612-619
[16]   Electrocatalytic oxidation of dopamine at murexide and TX-100 modified carbon paste electrode: A cyclic voltammetric study [J].
Mahanthesha, K. R. ;
Swamy, B. E. Kumara ;
Chandra, Umesh ;
Shankar, S. Sharath ;
Pai, K. V. .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2012, 172 :119-124
[17]   Influence of rhamnolipids and Triton X-100 on the desorption of pesticides from soils [J].
Mata-Sandoval, JC ;
Karns, J ;
Torrents, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (21) :4669-4675
[18]   Evaluation of oil removal efficiency and enzymatic activity in some fungal strains for bioremediation of petroleum-polluted soils [J].
Mohsenzadeh, Fariba ;
Rad, Abdolkarim Chehregani ;
Akbari, Mehrangiz .
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2012, 9
[19]  
Muherei M.A., 2009, J APPL SCI RES, V5, P181, DOI DOI 10.3923/AJAPS.2009.115.127
[20]   The use of soil-flushing to remediate metal contamination in a smelting slag dumping area: Column and pilot-scale experiments [J].
Navarro, Andres ;
Martinez, Francisco .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2010, 115 (1-2) :16-27