Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow up Protocol Based on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective

被引:22
作者
Chisci, Emiliano [1 ]
Harris, Linda [2 ]
Guidotti, Azzurra [1 ]
Pecchioli, Angelica [1 ]
Pigozzi, Clara [1 ]
Barbanti, Enrico [1 ]
Ercolini, Leonardo [3 ]
Michelagnoli, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] San Giovanni di Dio Hosp, Usl Toscana Ctr, Dept Surg, Vasc & Endovasc Surg Unit, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Buffalo State Univ New York, Div Vasc Surg, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] S Donato Hosp, Vasc & Endovasc Surg Unit, Cardiovasc Dept, Arezzo, Italy
关键词
Endovascular aortic repair follow-up; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Computed tomography angiography; Endovascular aortic repair; Endoleaks; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; ANEURYSM REPAIR; DUPLEX ULTRASOUND; EVAR; SURVEILLANCE; ENDOLEAK; METAANALYSIS; CEUS; CT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to define the safety and effectiveness of a contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) based follow up for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) surveillance at a mid-term period (4 years). Methods: At the tertiary referral centre EVAR surveillance was based on plain abdominal radiograph and duplex ultrasound (CDU), with computed tomography angiography (CTA) reserved for any non-diagnostic imaging during the period 1999-2011 (Group A). From 2012, CEUS was performed when (a) any endoleak was detected at CDU, (b) sac growth > 5 mm within 6 months, and routinely for (c) patients with renal insufficiency (above Stage 3 chronic kidney disease), or (d) iodine contrast allergy (Group B). Results: A total of 880 patients (mean age 75.6 +/- 8.4 years; 824 male) who underwent EVAR between 1999 and 2015 and with a minimum of 1 year follow up were included. Six hundred and nineteen patients were in Group A (70%) and the remaining 261 in Group B (30%). Median follow up was 48 months (interquartile range 24-84). During the study period 318 CEUS scans were performed with no related complications. Indications for CEUS were the following: (a) 160 (50%) endoleak presence, (b) 34 (11%) significant sac expansions, (c) 91 (29%) renal insufficiency (Stage 3 or above CKD), and 33 (10%) iodine contrast allergies. CEUS was compared with CTA, with additional confirmation by angiographic and operative findings in the case of repair in the first 100 patients. CEUS had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in classifying endoleaks. No differences in endoleak, re-interventions and sac shrinkage percentage were seen between the two groups at 4 years. A 4 year analysis of CTA use found a 90% reduction with the introduction of CEUS. Conclusions: The introduction of a CEUS based protocol for EVAR follow up was safe and effective and it was similar to the previous CTA based follow up protocol with regard to identification of endoleaks in a mid-term period. Moreover, CEUS allowed for 90% reduction of CTA, thereby decreasing radiation exposure for patients. (C) 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] 3D Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)
    Abbas, A.
    Hansrani, V.
    Sedgwick, N.
    Ghosh, J.
    McCollum, C. N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 47 (05) : 487 - 492
  • [2] Long-term surveillance with computed tomography after endovascular aneurysm repair may not be justified
    Black, S. A.
    Carrell, T. W. G.
    Bell, R. E.
    Waltham, M.
    Reidy, J.
    Taylor, P. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1280 - 1283
  • [3] Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound can Replace Computed Tomography Angiography for Surveillance After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Bredahl, K. K.
    Taudorf, M.
    Lonn, L.
    Vogt, K. C.
    Sillesen, H.
    Eiberg, J. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 52 (06) : 729 - 734
  • [4] EVAR: Benefits of CEUS for monitoring stent-graft status
    Cantisani, Vito
    Grazhdani, Hektor
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Iezzi, Roberto
    Aiani, Luca
    Martegani, Alberto
    Fanelli, Fabrizio
    Di Marzo, Luca
    Wlderk, Andrea
    Cirelli, Carlo
    Catalano, Carlo
    Di Leo, Nicola
    Di Segni, Mattia
    Malpassini, Flavio
    D'Ambrosio, Ferdinando
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (09) : 1658 - 1665
  • [5] Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Chaikof, EL
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Harris, PL
    White, GH
    Zarins, CK
    Bernhard, VM
    Matsumura, JS
    May, J
    Veith, FJ
    Fillinger, MF
    Rutherford, RB
    Kent, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) : 1048 - 1060
  • [6] The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines
    Chaikof, Elliot L.
    Brewster, David C.
    Dalman, Ronald L.
    Makaroun, Michel S.
    Illig, Karl A.
    Sicard, Gregorio A.
    Timaran, Carlos H.
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Veith, Frank J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 : 2S - 49S
  • [7] Surveillance Imaging Modality does not Affect Detection Rate of Asymptomatic Secondary Interventions following EVAR
    Chisci, E.
    Setacci, F.
    Iacoponi, F.
    de Donato, G.
    Cappelli, A.
    Setacci, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 43 (03) : 276 - 281
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) versus computed tomography angiography (CTA) in detection of endoleaks in post-EVAR patients. Are delayed type II endoleaks being missed? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chung J.
    Kordzadeh A.
    Prionidis I.
    Panayiotopoulos Y.
    Browne T.
    [J]. Journal of Ultrasound, 2015, 18 (2) : 91 - 99
  • [9] Advantages of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Over Computed Tomography for the Detection of Persistent Type II Endoleak After Embolization: A Case Report
    Cury, Maysa Heineck
    Martins Cury, Marcus Vinicius
    Godoy, Marcos Roberto
    Matielo, Marcelo Fernando
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2016, 44 (08) : 522 - 526
  • [10] What is the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of the endoleak of aortic endoprostheses? A comparison between CEUS and CT on a widespread scale
    David E.
    Cantisani V.
    Grazhdani H.
    Di Marzo L.
    Venturini L.
    Fanelli F.
    Di Segni M.
    Di Leo N.
    Brunese L.
    Calliada F.
    Ciccariello M.
    Bottari A.
    Ascenti G.
    D’Ambrosio F.
    [J]. Journal of Ultrasound, 2016, 19 (4) : 281 - 287