Geographic and sociodemographic variation in self-reported seat belt use in the United States

被引:69
作者
Strine, Tara W. [1 ]
Beck, Laurie F. [2 ]
Bolen, Julie [1 ]
Okoro, Catherine [1 ]
Dhingra, Satvinder [1 ]
Balluz, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Div Adult & Community Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Injury Prevent & Control, Div Unintent Injury Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Seat belt use; Injury; Primary and secondary seat belt laws; Geographic variation; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; SAFETY BELTS; COST; INJURY; TRAUMA; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.014
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Background: With new data available, we sought to update existing literature on the prevalence of self-reported seat belt use by state, region, and rural/urban status and to estimate the strength of the association between seat belt use and rural/urban status adjusted for type of seat belt law and several other factors. Methods: We examined data on self-reported use of seat belts from 50 states, the District of Columbia, and three territories using the 2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based random-digit-dialed telephone survey (n = 406,552). Reported seat belt use was assessed by state, U.S. Census regions, and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) rural/urban continuum codes. Results: Overall, 85% of adults in the United States reported they always used seat belts. Regionally, the West had the highest prevalence of persons who reported that they always wear seat belts (89.6%) and the Midwest had the lowest (80.4%). States with primary seat belt laws had the highest prevalence of reported seat belt use, compared with states with secondary or no laws. After adjusting for various sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index, and type of seat belt law, persons in the most densely populated metropolitan areas were significantly more likely to report always wearing seat belts than those in most sparsely populated rural areas (adjusted odds ratio=2.9). Conclusion: Our findings reinforce the evidence that primary enforcement seat belt laws are effective for increasing seat belt use, and suggest that upgrading to primary enforcement laws will be an important strategy for reducing crash-related fatalities in rural areas. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1071
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   THE COST OF NOT WEARING SEAT BELTS - A COMPARISON OF OUTCOME IN 3396 PATIENTS [J].
RUTLEDGE, R ;
LALOR, A ;
OLLER, D ;
HANSEN, A ;
THOMASON, M ;
MEREDITH, W ;
FOIL, MB ;
BAKER, C .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 217 (02) :122-127
[32]   Primary enforcement seat belt laws are effective even in the face of rising belt use rates [J].
Shults, RA ;
Elder, RW ;
Sleet, DA ;
Thompson, RS ;
Nichols, JL .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2004, 36 (03) :491-493
[33]  
*US BUR CENS, 2008, NSTEST200801 US BUR
[34]  
*US DEP COMM EC SA, 1999, CENS REG DIV US
[35]  
*US DEP TRANSP, 2008, PUBLICATION USDOT
[36]  
*USDA, 2004, BREIF ROOMS MEAS RUR
[37]  
Ward N.J., 2007, The Culture of Traffic Safety in Rural America. University of Michigan. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
[38]   COVERAGE GAPS IN SEAT-BELT USE LAWS [J].
WELLS, JK ;
WILLIAMS, AF ;
FIELDS, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1989, 79 (03) :332-333