Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

被引:34
作者
Mahmud, Priom [1 ]
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar [2 ]
Azeem, Abdullahil [1 ]
Chowdhury, Priyabrata [3 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Ind & Prod Engn, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, UTS Business Sch, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Accounting Informat Syst & Supply Chain, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
supply chain collaboration; resilience; small- and medium-sized enterprises; grey DEMATEL; fuzzy best-worst method; FUZZY BEST-WORST; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; LOGISTICS; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; COVID-19; INDUSTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su13137449
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The disruption has a significant impact on supply chain collaboration (SCC) which is an important task to improve performance for many enterprises. This is especially critical for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We developed a decision-modeling framework for analyzing SCC barriers in SMEs for the emerging economy in Bangladesh. Through literature review and expert opinion survey, we have identified a comprehensive list of SCC barriers under four main categories, namely, information-related, communication-related, intra-organizational, and inter-organizational barriers. Then we applied the Grey DEMATEL and Fuzzy Best-Worst methods to evaluate these SCC barriers and compared the results. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the proposed approach. The study reveals that lack of communication is the most crucial barrier in SCC, providing a model for assessing barriers in other emerging economies. This study contributes to the literature by analyzing SCC barriers and by comparing the results obtained from two different MCDM methods. The findings of this study can help decision-makers to plan for overcoming the most prioritized SCC barriers which ultimately contribute to improving the resilience and sustainability performances of SMEs.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Abdin M.J, 2014, DEV SMES REPLICATING, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2504480, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2504480]
[2]   Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains [J].
Allaoui, Hamid ;
Guo, Yuhan ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 :761-774
[3]   Evaluation of supply chain collaboration: a case of apparel retail industry in India [J].
Anbanandam, R. ;
Banwet, D. K. ;
Shankar, Ravi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 60 (02) :82-+
[4]   Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: a hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach [J].
Ansari, Zulfiquar N. ;
Kant, Ravi ;
Shankar, Ravi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2020, 13 (06) :473-494
[5]   Prioritizing the performance outcomes due to adoption of critical success factors of supply chain remanufacturing [J].
Ansari, Zulfiquar N. ;
Kant, Ravi ;
Shankar, Ravi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 :779-799
[6]   Distance Learning as a Resilience Strategy during Covid-19: An Analysis of the Italian Context [J].
Appolloni, Andrea ;
Colasanti, Nathalie ;
Fantauzzi, Chiara ;
Fiorani, Gloria ;
Frondizi, Rocco .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) :1-12
[7]   Horizontal collaboration in semiconductor manufacturing industry supply chain: An evaluation of collaboration intensity index [J].
Bahinipati, Bikram K. ;
Kanda, Arun ;
Deshmukh, S. G. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 57 (03) :880-895
[8]   Honoring complexity in sustainable supply chain research: a rough set theoretic approach (SI:ResMeth) [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (16) :1367-1384
[9]   Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain [J].
Barratt, M .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2004, 9 (01) :30-42
[10]   Guanxi and intra-organizational conflicts: evidence from Chinese logistics industry [J].
Butt, Atif Saleem .
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2019, 42 (04) :495-505