Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner

被引:126
作者
Kwan, Alexander L. C.
Boone, John M.
Yang, Kai
Huang, Shih-Ying
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Xray Imaging Lab, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biomed Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
breast imaging; computed tomography; cone beam; modulation transfer function; MTF;
D O I
10.1118/1.2400830
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the spatial resolution of a prototype pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography (CT) system. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of the reconstructed image in the coronal (x and y) plane were computed as a function of the cone angle, the radial distance from the axis of rotation, the size of the reconstruction matrix, the back-projection filter used, and the number of projections acquired for the reconstruction. The results show that the cone angle and size of the reconstruction matrix have minimal impact on the MTF, while the MTF degraded radially from the axis of rotation (from 0.76 at 2.6 mm from axis of rotation down to 0.37 at 76.9 mm from axis of rotation at f=0.5 mm(-1)). The Ramp reconstruction filter increases the MTF near the axis of rotation relative to the Shepp-Logan filter, while an increase in the number of projections from 500 to 1000 increased the MTF near the periphery of the reconstructed image. The MTF in the z direction (anterior-posterior direction) was also evaluated. The z-direction MTF values tend to be higher when compared to the coronal MTF (0.85 at f =0.5 mm(-1)), and tend to be very constant throughout the coronal plane direction. The results suggest that an increase in the MTF for the prototype breast CT system is possible by optimizing various scanning and reconstruction parameters. (c) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Barnes G.T., 1979, The Physics of Medical Imaging: Recording System, Measurements and Techniques
[2]  
Barrett H.H., 1981, RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING
[3]  
BISCHOF C J, 1977, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V4, P163, DOI 10.1118/1.594305
[4]   Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose and image quality evaluation [J].
Boone, JM ;
Nelson, TR ;
Lindfors, KK ;
Seibert, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) :657-667
[5]   Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography [J].
Boone, JM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (03) :356-360
[6]   Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study [J].
Chen, B ;
Ning, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :755-770
[7]   Cone-beam CT breast imaging with a flat panel detector - a simulation study [J].
Chen, LY ;
Shaw, CC ;
Tu, SJ ;
Altunbas, M ;
Wang, T ;
Lai, CJ ;
Liu, XM ;
Kappadath, SC .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 5745 :943-951
[8]   Flat panel CT detectors for sub-second volumetric scanning [J].
Colbeth, RE ;
Mollov, IP ;
Roos, PG ;
Shapiro, EG .
Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5745 :387-398
[9]   A METHOD FOR MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION DETERMINATION FROM EDGE PROFILES WITH CORRECTION FOR FINITE-ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
CUNNINGHAM, IA ;
FENSTER, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (04) :533-537
[10]   A PRACTICAL METHOD TO MEASURE THE MTF OF CT SCANNERS [J].
DROEGE, RT ;
MORIN, RL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 9 (05) :758-759