Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

被引:20
作者
Torre, Marina [1 ]
Luzi, Ilaria [1 ]
Mirabella, Fiorino [2 ]
Del Manso, Martina [3 ]
Zanoli, Gustavo [4 ]
Tucci, Gabriele [5 ]
Romanini, Emilio [6 ]
机构
[1] Ist Super Sanita, Natl Ctr Clin Excellence Safety & Qual Care, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy
[2] Ist Super Sanita, Ctr Behav Sci & Mental Hlth, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy
[3] Ist Super Sanita, Dept Infect Dis, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy
[4] Casa Cura Santa Maria Maddalena, Via Gorizia 2, Occhiobello, RO, Italy
[5] Osped S Giuseppe, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Via Olivella Km 1, Albano Laziale, RM, Italy
[6] Casa Cura San Feliciano, ArtroGruppo, Via Enrico De Osso 6, Rome, Italy
关键词
HOOS; Hip osteoarthritis; Total hip arthroplasty; Cross cultural validation; Registry; WOMAC OSTEOARTHRITIS; WESTERN-ONTARIO; HEALTH SURVEY; RELIABILITY; TRANSLATION; VALIDITY; RESPONSIVENESS; QUALITY; COSMIN; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-018-0935-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To create a translated version of the HOOS to fit the Italian population and to test its psychometric properties and validity in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: The HOOS Italian version was developed according to published international guidelines that include preparation, forward translation and reconciliation, backward translation, review and harmonization, and proof reading. The Italian HOOS was administered to 145 patients (mean age 65.7 +/- 11.6 years, 34-89, 58.6% women) undergoing THA. The following psychometric properties were evaluated internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (Pearson's r and intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC), convergent validity (Spearman's rho between HOOS and SF-36), responsiveness (comparison of pre/post-THA scores, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Interpretability (floor and ceiling effects, skewness and kurtosis indexes) and acceptability (time to compiling, missing answers, and autonomy in compilation) were also evaluated. Results: Translation and transcultural adaptation were conducted in accordance with the international recommendation. The translation was deemed understandable and appropriate as to the transcultural adaptation. None of the patients reported to have met any difficulties in reading and understanding the HOOS items. Internal consistency and test retest reliability were good for each HOOS subscale (Cronbach's alpha >= 0.7, Pearson's r and ICC > 0.80). Convergent validity showed the highest correlations (Spearman's rho > 0.5) between HOOS and SF-36 subscales relating to similar dimensions. As to responsiveness, all HOOS subscales scores improved significantly after THA (p < 0.01). Interpretability was acceptable despite ceiling effect in post-THA assessment. Acceptability was good: HOOS resulted easy and quick to fill out (12 min on average). Conclusions: The HOOS was successfully cross culturally adapted into Italian. The Italian HOOS showed good psychometric properties therefore it can be useful to assess outcomes in OA patients after THA. This study provided a basis for its use within the Italian Arthroplasty Registry and for future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain [J].
Angst, Felix ;
Verra, Martin L. ;
Lehmann, Susanne ;
Aeschlimann, Andre .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[2]   The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, validation and norming [J].
Apolone, G ;
Mosconi, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1025-1036
[3]  
Barbaranelli C., 2003, TECNICHE MULTIVARIAT
[4]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[5]   Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [J].
Blasimann, Angela ;
Dauphinee, Sharon Wood ;
Staal, J. Bart .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (12) :989-993
[6]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[7]   Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [J].
de Groot, I. B. ;
Reijman, M. ;
Terwee, C. B. ;
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. ;
Favejee, M. ;
Roos, E. M. ;
Verhaar, J. A. N. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2007, 15 (01) :104-109
[8]  
George D., 2010, USING SPSS WINDOWS S
[9]   TOTAL HIP AND TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT .2. [J].
HARRIS, WH ;
SLEDGE, CB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (12) :801-807
[10]   Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score -: An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [J].
Klässbo, M ;
Larsson, E ;
Mannevik, E .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 32 (01) :46-51