Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

被引:31
|
作者
Johnson, Kristin [1 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ]
Rosso, Aldana [1 ]
Sartor, Hanna [1 ]
Saal, Lao H. [2 ]
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ]
Lang, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Inga Marie Nilssons Gata 49, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Div Oncol & Pathol, Translat Oncogen Unit, Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; GRADE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019190132
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Screening accuracy can be improved with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). To further evaluate DBT in screening, it is important to assess the molecular subtypes of the detected cancers. Purpose: To describe tumor characteristics, including molecular subtypes, of cancers detected at DBT compared with those detected at digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. Materials and Methods: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial is a prospective, population-based screening trial comparing one-view DBT with two-view DM. Tumor characteristics were obtained, and invasive cancers were classified according to St Gallen as follows: luminal A-like, luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative/HER2-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative cancers. Tumor characteristics were compared by mode of detection: DBT alone or DM (ie, DBT and DM or DM alone). chi(2) test was used for data analysis. Results: Between January 2010 and February 2015, 14 848 women were enrolled (mean age, 57 years +/- 10; age range, 40-76 years). In total, 139 cancers were detected; 118 cancers were invasive and 21 were ductal carcinomas in situ. Thirty-seven additional invasive cancers (36 cancers with complete subtypes and stage) were detected at DBT alone, and 81 cancers (80 cancers with complete stage) were detected at DM. No differences were seen between DBT and DM in the distribution of tumor size 20 mm or smaller (86% [31 of 36] vs 85% [68 of 80], respectively; P = .88), node-negative status (75% [27 of 36] vs 74% [59 of 80], respectively; P = .89), or luminal A-like subtype (53% [19 of 36] vs 46% [37 of 81], respectively; P = .48). Conclusion: The biologic profile of the additional cancers detected at digital breast tomosynthesis in a large prospective population-based screening trial was similar to those detected at digital mammography, and the majority were early-stage luminal A-like cancers. This indicates that digital breast tomosynthesis screening does not alter the predictive and prognostic profile of screening-detected cancers. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 281
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Budget impact analysis of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening in Italy
    Djuric, Olivera
    Deandrea, Silvia
    Mantellini, Paola
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    Venturelli, Francesco
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Vecchio, Riccardo
    Bucchi, Lauro
    Senore, Carlo
    Giordano, Livia
    Paci, Eugenio
    Bonifacino, Adriana
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Caumo, Francesca
    Degrassi, Flori
    de' Bianchi, Priscilla Sassoli
    Battisti, Francesca
    Zappa, Marco
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    Campari, Cinzia
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Frigerio, Alfonso
    Magni, Veronica
    Fornasa, Francesca
    Romanucci, Giovanna
    Falini, Patrizia
    Auzzi, Noemi
    Armaroli, Paola
    Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (09): : 1288 - 1302
  • [32] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates
    Boroumand, Gilda
    Teberian, Ida
    Parker, Laurence
    Rao, Vijay M.
    Levin, David C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (05) : 1092 - 1096
  • [33] Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Abraham, Linn
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Hampton, John M.
    Henderson, Louise
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Stein, Sarah
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (10) : 1222 - 1231
  • [34] Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis
    Yun, Seong Jong
    Ryu, Chang-Woo
    Rhee, Sun Jung
    Ryu, Jung Kyu
    Oh, Ji Young
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (03) : 557 - 569
  • [35] Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Singer, Tisha M.
    Jimoh, Nneka
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [36] Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis
    Seong Jong Yun
    Chang-Woo Ryu
    Sun Jung Rhee
    Jung Kyu Ryu
    Ji Young Oh
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 164 : 557 - 569
  • [37] Performance Metrics of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Based on Years Since a Prior Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Do, Daniel
    Mercaldo, Sarah
    Bahl, Manisha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (03)
  • [38] Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Dang, Pragya A.
    Wang, Aijia
    Senapati, Gunjan M.
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Giess, Catherine S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (03) : 701 - 706
  • [39] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Preibsch, H.
    Siegmann-Luz, K. C.
    RADIOLOGE, 2015, 55 (01): : 59 - 69
  • [40] Assessment of Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Coley, R. Yates
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Rauscher, Garth H.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Onega, Tracy
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (03) : E201759