Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

被引:35
作者
Johnson, Kristin [1 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ]
Rosso, Aldana [1 ]
Sartor, Hanna [1 ]
Saal, Lao H. [2 ]
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ]
Lang, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Inga Marie Nilssons Gata 49, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Div Oncol & Pathol, Translat Oncogen Unit, Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; GRADE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019190132
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Screening accuracy can be improved with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). To further evaluate DBT in screening, it is important to assess the molecular subtypes of the detected cancers. Purpose: To describe tumor characteristics, including molecular subtypes, of cancers detected at DBT compared with those detected at digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. Materials and Methods: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial is a prospective, population-based screening trial comparing one-view DBT with two-view DM. Tumor characteristics were obtained, and invasive cancers were classified according to St Gallen as follows: luminal A-like, luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative/HER2-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative cancers. Tumor characteristics were compared by mode of detection: DBT alone or DM (ie, DBT and DM or DM alone). chi(2) test was used for data analysis. Results: Between January 2010 and February 2015, 14 848 women were enrolled (mean age, 57 years +/- 10; age range, 40-76 years). In total, 139 cancers were detected; 118 cancers were invasive and 21 were ductal carcinomas in situ. Thirty-seven additional invasive cancers (36 cancers with complete subtypes and stage) were detected at DBT alone, and 81 cancers (80 cancers with complete stage) were detected at DM. No differences were seen between DBT and DM in the distribution of tumor size 20 mm or smaller (86% [31 of 36] vs 85% [68 of 80], respectively; P = .88), node-negative status (75% [27 of 36] vs 74% [59 of 80], respectively; P = .89), or luminal A-like subtype (53% [19 of 36] vs 46% [37 of 81], respectively; P = .48). Conclusion: The biologic profile of the additional cancers detected at digital breast tomosynthesis in a large prospective population-based screening trial was similar to those detected at digital mammography, and the majority were early-stage luminal A-like cancers. This indicates that digital breast tomosynthesis screening does not alter the predictive and prognostic profile of screening-detected cancers. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 281
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BRE
[2]   Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers [J].
Bahl, Manisha ;
Gaffney, Shannon ;
McCarthy, Anne Marie ;
Lowry, Kathryn P. ;
Dang, Pragya A. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (01) :49-57
[3]   Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study [J].
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Ostillio, Livio ;
Tuttobene, Paolina ;
Luparia, Andrea ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08) :1105-1113
[4]   Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening [J].
Caumo, Francesca ;
Romanucci, Giovanna ;
Hunter, Kylie ;
Zorzi, Manuel ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 170 (02) :391-397
[5]   Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Caumo, Francesca ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Tuttobene, Paola ;
Bricolo, Paola ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Montemezzi, Stefania ;
Macaskill, Petra .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) :583-589
[6]   Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density [J].
Conant, Emily F. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Herschorn, Sally D. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Beaber, Elisabeth F. ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Lowry, Kathryn P. ;
Stout, Natasha K. ;
Trentham-Dietz, Amy ;
diFlorio-Alexander, Roberta M. ;
Li, Christopher I. ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Onega, Tracy ;
Sprague, Brian L. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Onega, Tracy ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
Birdwell, Robyn ;
Khorasani, Ramin ;
Lacson, Ronilda ;
Ozanne, Elissa ;
Tosteson, Tor D. ;
Bronson, Mackenzie ;
Chen, Jane ;
Goodrich, Martha ;
Harris, Kimberly A. ;
St Hubert, Stella ;
Pearson, Loretta ;
Andrews, Steven ;
Anton, Kristen ;
Batcho, Katrine ;
Brawarsky, Phyllis ;
Cook, Charles ;
Das, Amar ;
Dougher, Ryan ;
Eliassen, Scottie ;
Farr, Scott ;
Felone, Carol ;
Frazee, Tracy ;
Gerlach, Scott ;
Getty, George ;
Gilman, John ;
Hanson, Dick ;
Johnson, Dennis ;
Joseph, Brenda ;
Laam, Leslie A. ;
Levin, Brian ;
Pyle, Steven ;
Sims-Larabee, Laura .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) :635-642
[7]   Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series [J].
Crispo, Anna ;
Barba, Maddalena ;
D'Aiuto, Giuseppe ;
De Laurentiis, Michelino ;
Grimaldi, Maria ;
Rinaldo, Massimo ;
Caolo, Giuseppina ;
D'Aiuto, Massimiliano ;
Capasso, Immacolata ;
Esposito, Emanuela ;
Amore, Alfonso ;
Di Bonito, Maurizio ;
Botti, Gerardo ;
Montella, Maurizio .
BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
[8]   De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017 (vol 28, pg 1700, 2017) [J].
Curigliano, G. ;
Burstein, H. J. ;
Winer, E. P. ;
Gnant, M. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Loibl, S. ;
Colleoni, M. ;
Regan, M. M. ;
Piccart-Gebhart, M. ;
Senn, H. -J. ;
Thurlimann, B. ;
Andre, F. ;
Baselga, J. ;
Bergh, J. ;
Bonnefoi, H. ;
Brucker, S. Y. ;
Cardoso, F. ;
Carey, L. ;
Ciruelos, E. ;
Cuzick, J. ;
Denkert, C. ;
Di Leo, A. ;
Ejlertsen, B. ;
Francis, P. ;
Galimberti, V. ;
Garber, J. ;
Gulluoglu, B. ;
Goodwin, P. ;
Harbeck, N. ;
Hayes, D. F. ;
Huang, C. -S. ;
Huober, J. ;
Khaled, H. ;
Jassem, J. ;
Jiang, Z. ;
Karlsson, P. ;
Morrow, M. ;
Orecchia, R. ;
Osborne, K. C. ;
Pagani, O. ;
Partridge, A. H. ;
Pritchard, K. ;
Ro, J. ;
Rutgers, E. J. T. ;
Sedlmayer, F. ;
Semiglazov, V. ;
Shao, Z. ;
Smith, I. ;
Toi, M. ;
Tutt, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (10) :2153-2153
[9]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[10]   Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? [J].
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
James, Jonathan J. ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Cornford, Eleanor .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (05) :1377-1380