Assessing solution quality and computational performance in the hydro unit commitment problem considering different mathematical programming approaches

被引:46
作者
Finardi, E. C. [1 ]
Takigawa, F. Y. K. [2 ]
Brito, B. H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Elect Syst Planning Res Lab, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Santa Catarina, BR-88020300 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Fed Inst Tocantins, BR-77020450 Palmas, Brazil
关键词
Hydro unit commitment; Lagrangian relaxation; Mixed-integer nonlinear programming; Mixed-integer linear programming; Hydropower model; ELECTRICITY MARKET; POWER; OPTIMIZATION; RESERVOIR; PRODUCER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2016.02.018
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comparative analysis of different mathematical programming approaches for optimizing the hydro unit commitment (HUC) problem with cascaded plants, multiple generating units, and a head-dependent hydropower model. Regarding the HUC problem related to this paper, the objective is to minimize the cascade outflow while satisfying all constraints, including a power target for each plant, in a day-ahead planning horizon. The decision variables are the on/off status of the units and the respective generation levels. Rigorously, the HUC is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem, and several strategies can be used to compute near-optimal solutions. In this paper, we are interested in accessing the solution quality, as well as the computational performance when the HUC problem is solved using the following mathematical programming approaches: (i) the Lagrangian relaxation that represents a decomposition technique that exploits the HUC modeling structure, (ii) a MINLP solver that can handle the size and the non-concavity of the problem, and (iii) a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approach obtained by means of the hydropower model linearization. To perform the proposed analysis, numerical results are presented related to a real hydro system with eight cascaded reservoirs and 29 generating units. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 222
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Athena scientific Belmont
[2]  
[Anonymous], IEEE POWER TECH
[3]   Piece-wise linear approximation of functions of two variables [J].
Babayev Djangir A. .
Journal of Heuristics, 1997, 2 (4) :313-320
[4]   Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization [J].
Belotti, Pietro ;
Kirches, Christian ;
Leyffer, Sven ;
Linderoth, Jeff ;
Luedtke, James ;
Mahajan, Ashutosh .
ACTA NUMERICA, 2013, 22 :1-131
[5]  
Bisschop JohannesJ., 1993, AIMMS: The modeling system
[6]  
Bonnans JF, 2006, NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATI, V2nd, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-05078-1
[7]   An MILP approach for short-term hydro scheduling and unit commitment with head-dependent reservoir [J].
Borghetti, Alberto ;
D'Ambrosio, Claudia ;
Lodi, Andrea ;
Martello, Silvano .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (03) :1115-1124
[8]   Hydro energy systems management in Portugal: Profit-based evaluation of a mixed-integer nonlinear approach [J].
Catalao, J. P. S. ;
Pousinho, H. M. I. ;
Mendes, V. M. F. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) :500-507
[9]   Scheduling of head-dependent cascaded reservoirs considering discharge ramping constraints and start/stop of units [J].
Catalao, J. P. S. ;
Pousinho, H. M. I. ;
Mendes, V. M. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2010, 32 (08) :904-910
[10]   AUXILIARY PROBLEM PRINCIPLE AND DECOMPOSITION OF OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS [J].
COHEN, G .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1980, 32 (03) :277-305