Theorizing social media and activism: where is community development?

被引:4
作者
McCabe, Angus [1 ]
Harris, Kevin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham Edgbaston, Sect Res Ctr 3, Dept Social Policy Sociol & Criminol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sect Res Ctr 3, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
OCCUPY WALL-STREET; COLLECTIVE ACTION; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS; COMMUNICATION; FACEBOOK; PROTEST; TWITTER; INFORMATION; IDENTITY; INDIGNADOS;
D O I
10.1093/cdj/bsz024
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There is a growing public and academic debate on the societal impacts of the internet and, in particular, social media. For its proponents, social media is a force for change, which can challenge entrenched hierarchies, redistribute power, democratize information, support mass mobilization and contribute to the building of global movements. Increasingly such positivist arguments are being questioned. Critics argue that it has become a sinister force, facilitating the spread of 'fake news', providing an instrument for citizen surveillance and re-enforcing neoliberal hegemony. The community development literature has barely engaged in those debates around social media that appear urgent in other disciplines. Social media has been seen as a value-free tool for broadcasting and dissemination, and neither evaluated as a force for change nor examined as an instrument of neoliberal intents. Although there is a community development literature on neoliberalism and globalization, it often accepts these, rather than critiques them, as the contexts within which community development operates. Challenging established power imbalances and enhancing citizen participation in democratic processes are purposes central to community development values. Analysis of wider literature raises questions with regard to the values embedded in the technologies from which enhanced levels of participation and engagement are expected to flow. It also raises questions about who benefits most from the affordances of these technologies. This article, drawing on an extensive literature review, presents the case for community development values to be asserted in these debates.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 337
页数:20
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Occupy PR: An analysis of online media communications of Occupy Wall Street and Occupy London [J].
Adi, Ana .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2015, 41 (04) :508-514
[2]   Can community development practice survive neoliberalism in Aotearoa New Zealand? [J].
Aimers, Jenny ;
Walker, Peter .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 51 (03) :332-349
[3]   How the Facebook Arabic Page "We Are All Khaled Said" Helped Promote the Egyptian Revolution [J].
Alaimo, Kara .
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2015, 1 (02)
[4]  
Alinsky S., 1971, RULES RADICALS PRACT
[5]  
Angwin J., 2016, FACEBOOK LETS ADVERT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WORKING COMMUNITIES
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J COMM UNITY INFORM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 139 U BIRM 3 SECT RE
[9]   Rhetorical framing: examining the message structure of nonprofit organizations on Twitter [J].
Auger, Giselle Andree .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR MARKETING, 2014, 19 (04) :239-249
[10]   Islamophobia and Twitter: A Typology of Online Hate Against Muslims on Social Media [J].
Awan, Imran .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2014, 6 (02) :133-150